Facts of the
Case
The assessee company was engaged in the business of real estate
development and transactions.
The original owner, Shri Baljeet Singh Malhotra, entered into a
collaboration agreement wit...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 22 August 2008 pertaining to Assessment Year 2003-04.The Ass...
Facts of the Case
The assessee, Modi Industries Limited, claimed various deductions
and tax benefits under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Revenue disputed:
Non-applicability of Section 40A(5)(c) to salar...
Facts of the
Case
Engineers India Ltd. was assessed for Assessment Year 1996-97.
During the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer
issued notices and questionnaires under Section 142(1) of the ...
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department initiated reassessment proceedings
against the respondent-assessee. The Assessing Officer issued formal notices
for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Howev...
Facts of the
Case
The Assessing Officer had made various additions and disallowances
during the assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2003-04.
The assessee challenged the additions before the Commissioner...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Career Launcher (India) Limited, for
Assessment Year 2004-05, claimed deduction of various expenditures including:
Non-compete fee of Rs. 5,40,000 paid to Mr. Vijay Kalyan Jha and
...
Facts of the CaseThe Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of
Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India awarded a contract to Paradeep
Phosphates Ltd. (PPL), a public sector undertaking.Subsequently, PPL entered int...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Mr. Vivek Bikki Kacker, filed his
return of income for Assessment Year 2003-04 declaring income of ₹2,47,691.During scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer
noticed that the assessee...
Facts of the
CaseFor the assessment year under consideration, the
assessee-company disclosed loans aggregating to ₹17,10,000 allegedly received
from five parties:
Gayatri Tech. Services – ₹7,75,000
S.K. Mehr...