Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Group Captain J.C. Sen Gupta (Retd.) vs Appropriate Authority, Income Tax Department – Eviction and Tenant Rights under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupation) Act, 1971 and Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956
Facts of the Case:
Petitioner, Group Captain J.C. Sen Gupta (Retd.), had been
occupying a 896 sq. ft. property at Vasant Vihar, New Delhi since 1976 as
a tenant under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956.
The...
The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rajendra Seclease Ltd.: Assessment of Sale Consideration of Unquoted Shares under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Rajendra Seclease Ltd.,
engaged in the business of buying and selling shares, filed its income tax
return for the assessment year 2002-03. The company sold 2,255,500 unquoted
equity shar...
C & C Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Depreciation on Temporary Sheds & Capital vs Revenue Expenditure (Sec. 260A, Income Tax Act, 1961)
Fact of the CaseThe appellant, C & C Construction Pvt. Ltd.,
challenged the order of the Income Tax Tribunal (ITA No. 4000/Del/2007)
relating to Assessment Year 2003-04. The dispute concerned depreciation claimed
...
Maruti Suzuki India Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Writ Petition on Adjustment of Refunds under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseMaruti Suzuki India Limited, the petitioner, sought
a writ against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax to restrain recovery of
disputed tax demand for AY 2006-07 pending their appeal before the ITAT...
The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rajendra Seclease Ltd. – Delhi High Court, Section 260A, Income Tax Act, 1961 | Sale of Unquoted Shares
Facts of the
CaseRajendra Seclease Ltd., engaged in trading of
shares, dividends, and securities, filed its return of income for AY 2002-03,
reporting the sale of 2,255,500 unquoted shares at Rs. 5 per share (totaling...
National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Long-Term Finance Deductions
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant, National Cooperative Development
Corporation (NCDC), filed multiple appeals (ITA Nos. 512/2011, 513/2011,
810/2011, 811/2011, 1139/2011, 1140/2011, 1141/2011) under Section 260A of the
...
Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseVodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd., the
petitioner, filed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the
proviso to Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the
Fina...
Tata Teleservices Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax TDS & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tata Teleservices Ltd, filed
multiple writ petitions (W.P.(C) Nos. 2024/2011, 2026/2011, 2027/2011,
2030/2011 & 2032/2011) challenging the vires of the proviso to Section
201(3) o...
National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Long-Term Finance Income
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant, National Cooperative Development
Corporation, engaged in providing long-term finance under the National
Cooperative Development Corporation Act, 1962, claimed deductions under Section
...
Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Vodafone Essar Mobile Services
Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the vires of the proviso to
Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the Finance (No.2)
Act...