Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Ex-Parte APGST Assessment for Missing DIN Number in Sree Vishwaksen Constructions (W.P. No. 15075 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sree Vishwaksen Constructions, a partnership firm, was subjected to an ex-parte assessment order dated 16.08.2024 under Section 73 of the APGST Act, 2017 for the period April 2020 to ...
Willingness to Pay Outstanding Dues Secures the Revocation Route: Orissa High Court Condones Delay in a Cancelled GST Registration Case of Dibyasen Behera vs Principal Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar (W.P.(C) No. 19182 of 2026)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Dibyasen Behera, had his GST registration cancelled under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by order dated 19th November, 2025, pursuant to a show cause notice dated 16th Octob...
Section 161 Rectification Used to Recall a Favourable Appellate Order Held Impermissible Review: Allahabad High Court Restores Assessee's Appeal Relief in Opasil Pigments And Chemicals vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 613 of 2020)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Opasil Pigments And Chemicals (P) Ltd. and M/s Shyam Enterprises (decided by common order), had earlier succeeded before the Appellate Authority, which by order dated 8.2.2020 allowed th...
Registration, ITC Ledger and Bank Attachment All Restored: Karnataka High Court Quashes Time-Barred GST Registration Cancellation and Recovery Actions in Subhash and Others vs Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Shivamogga (WP No. 29461 of 2024 and Connected Matters)
Facts of the CaseFour connected petitioners, including M/s Hoovinahalli Traders, M/s AJ Traders, M/s Channabhasaveshwara Arecanut Traders and Swamy Traders, all small commodity traders in Karnataka, had their GST registr...
GST Demand Order Confirming Tax Far Exceeding the Show Cause Notice Amount Quashed for Violating Section 75(7): Allahabad High Court Remands for Fresh Adjudication in Sai Computers vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 4370 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sai Computers, challenged an order dated 28.08.2024 passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, which raised a demand of Rs.1,55,878.26 for the period relevant to FY 2019-20. This ...
Protest Payment Counts as Pre-Deposit: Karnataka High Court Restores GST Appeal Rejected for Alleged Shortfall in 10 Percent Deposit in Magna Electronics India vs Joint Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) (WP No. 2444 of 2024)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Magna Electronics India Private Limited (formerly Veoneer India Pvt. Ltd.), faced proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act for July 2017 to March 2020, during which it paid Rs. 1,99,1...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Order and Ex-Parte Appeal for Improper Hearing-Date Sequencing in Raj Transport And Traders (Writ Tax No. 768 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raj Transport And Traders, challenged an order dated 04.06.2025 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act along with an appellate order dated 19.02.2025 that had disposed of its appeal ex-pa...
Section 73 GST Order and Time-Barred Appeal Quashed for Denial of Personal Hearing, Following Mahaveer Trading Company: Allahabad High Court Directs Fresh Adjudication in Aman Road Lines vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 1385 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Aman Road Lines (GSTIN 09AASPA9132F1ZM), challenged an order dated 22.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, along with a subsequent order dated...
Additional Notices Tab Again Fatal: Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Demand for Wrong Portal Upload Following Ola Fleet and Mohini Traders in Harbansh Singh Bindra vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 2421 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/S Harbansh Singh Bindra, challenged orders dated 30.12.2023 and 28.09.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Bareilly, under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Servic...
Section 73 Order and Time-Barred Appeal Quashed for Denial of Mandatory Personal Hearing Under Section 75(4): Allahabad High Court Follows Mahaveer Trading Company in Digitext Technologies India vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 1297 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Digitext Technologies India Private Limited, challenged an order dated 08.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, along with a subsequent order dated...