Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,589,493
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Moradabad Toll Road Co. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Whether Toll Roads Qualify as ‘Plant’ or ‘Building’ for Depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant, Moradabad Toll Road Co. Ltd., is a 100% subsidiary of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). It was established specifically to construct a 18.2 km highway and bypass at Morada...

CIT vs. M/S Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd.: Computation of Section 80M Deductions and Amortization of Leasehold Expenses

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, M/S Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited, filed its return for Assessment Year 1986-87, which was assessed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The asse...

UCO Bank vs. Union of India & Ors. : Applicability of TDS on Interest Accrued on Court-Ordered Fixed Deposits under Section 194A

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 228
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, UCO Bank, held several Fixed Deposits (FDs) in the name of the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court. These deposits were made pursuant to court orders in various litigations where ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I, New Delhi vs. Shailendra Mahato, Simon Marandi, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, Shibu Soren, and Suraj Mandal (2014:DHC:5900-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the Case: Search warrants were executed on April 26, 1996, at Punjab National Bank, Naoroji Nagar, New Delhi. The search uncovered multiple Savings Bank (SB) accounts and Fixed Deposit ...

Om Fincap Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Quashing of Search Proceedings Due to Mistaken Identity under Section 132

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 202
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department initiated search operations on 23.05.2013 at the residential and office premises of the petitioners. The department believed the petitioner, Mr. Om Prakash Dhingra, was a di...

High Court Quashes Income Tax Search Operations Due to Mistaken Identity: Om Prakash Dhingra vs. CIT Section 132

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 171
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case involved three interconnected writ petitions filed by Om Prakash Dhingra, his son Pawan Kumar Dhingra, and their company, Om Fincap Private Limited. The Income Tax Department had issued a warr...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopal: Disallowance of Brand Building Expenses under Section 37(1) vs. Subjective Reasonableness

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 201
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, an individual, was subjected to proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following a search and seizure operation on the Gopal Zarda group. During the assessment year...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. M/S Indraprastha Cancer Society (2014) | Section 11 - Depreciation Claim on Capital Assets

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessees are charitable institutions governed by Sections 11 to 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The institutions purchased capital assets and treated the expenditure incurred on these p...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. JDS Apparels Private Limited: Applicability of Section 194H on Credit Card Commission

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 291
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, JDS Apparels Private Limited, is engaged in the business of trading readymade garments. During the assessment year 2009-10, the assessee utilized card swiping machines provided...

CIT-VI vs. Valvoline Cummins Ltd.: Reassessment Cannot Be Based on Mere Suspicion of "Unascertained Liability" Under Section 147

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 191
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Valvoline Cummins Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 on November 30, 2006, declaring an income of ₹9,52,15,517. The assessment was initially co...