Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
931,732
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Dabur India Limited vs. CIT: Mandatory Deduction of Depreciation for Computing Sections 80-IB and 80HHC Deductions for AY 2001-02

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, M/s Dabur India Limited, preferred an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the judgment dated April 5, 2007, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (...

Dabur India Limited vs. CIT: Mandatory Deduction of Depreciation for Computing Section 80-IB and 80HHC Deductions

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Dabur India Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacturing herbal products and cosmetics. For the Assessment Year 2000-01, the company filed its return of income on November 3...

CIT vs. M/s Lotus Trans Travels Pvt. Ltd.: Taxability of Debatable Claims and Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 60
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals under consideration were filed by the Revenue against a common appellate order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 06.07.2007, which spanned across the Assessment Yea...

CIT vs. M/s Tosha International Ltd.: Taxability of Principal Loan Waiver under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Tosha International Ltd., was engaged in manufacturing black and white television picture tubes. The company ran into immense financial losses, eventually becoming a sick industrial...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Videon – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Leviable Where Claim of Exemption on Sale of Land Was Made Bona Fide and Later Withdrawn | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1993-94 and disclosed a capital gain of ₹19,45,920 arising from the sale of land. Subsequently, the assessee filed a revised return claimin...

Income Tax Officer v/s M/s Giggles (P) Ltd. & Others Effect of Deletion of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Prosecution under Section 276C and Section 278B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed a criminal revision petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge. The dispute arose from criminal prosecution initiated against M/s Giggles (P) Ltd. a...

CIT vs. M/s Tosha zLtd.: Taxability of Principal Loan Waiver under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Tosha International Ltd., was engaged in manufacturing black and white television picture tubes. The company ran into immense financial losses, eventually becoming a sick industrial ...

M/s. Goetze India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Central | Mandamus and Stay of Coercive Recovery Pending Refund Set-Off under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Goetze India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Delhi. The petitioner had submitted an application dated April 17, ...

M/S Nitin Developers and Const. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi | Validity of Case Transfer Under Section 127(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Without Notice

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/S Nitin Developers and Const., filed a petition for a writ of certiorari assailing the validity of an order dated August 5, 2005 (as amended by a corrigendum dated August 17, 2005). T...

M/s Ram Bagh Palace Hotel (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Capital vs Revenue Expenditure on Hotel Renovation, Tribunal's Duty to Give Reasons While Reversing CIT(A) Order | AY 1995-96 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Ram Bagh Palace Hotel (P) Ltd., incurred expenditure on various works connected with its hotel property during Assessment Year 1995-96. The disputed expenses included: Glass supply...