Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
932,647
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. M/S Shanker Lal Ved Prakash: Presumption of Service of Notice Under Section 143(2) of Income-Tax Act, 1861 Read With Section 27 of General Clauses Act and Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act Regarding Statutory Limitation Period

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee (Respondent) filed his income tax return on 29.08.1997 for the Assessment Year 1997-98, declaring an income of ₹41,98,800. Under the proviso to Section 143(2) of th...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, New Delhi vs. M/S Hindustan Tin Works Ltd: Deletion of Addition Made Under Section 145(2) Due to Absence of Unaccounted Sales and Merely Alleged Discrepancies Between Daily Production Reports and Stock Registers Sustained in the Absence of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee's Business: The Assessee, M/S Hindustan Tin Works Ltd, is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of tin containers. Search and Seizure: A search and seizure operation was ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XVII vs. M/s Reebok India Company: Whether Adjustable, Non-Refundable Security Deposit Amounts to 'Rent' Under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 necessitating TDS?

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Lease Agreement: The Respondent/Assessee (M/s Reebok India Company) entered into an agreement with M/s ABCO Footwear Care to take premises on lease at a monthly rent of Rs. 6,26,...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central)-II vs. Shri Anil Kumar: Delhi High Court Judgment on Section 68 Income Tax Act Regarding the Rejection of Sham Foreign NRE Account Gifts and the Failure of Assessee to Discharge the Tripartite Onus of Establishing Identity, Financial Capacity, and Transaction Genuineness

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee (Shri Anil Kumar) filed his Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year (AY) 1995-96 on October 31, 1995, declaring an income of ₹1,04,249. The initial assessment was fi...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II, New Delhi v. M/s Malibu Estate [2007:DHC:218-DB] — Direct Tax Case Analysis: Credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under Section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Allowable to the Substantive Income Earner (AOP) Even When TDS Certificates Are Issued in the Name of a Group Entity/Joint Venture Partner

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the Case Five distinct corporate entities were incorporated on April 28, 1992, collectively forming the "Malibu Group of Companies". The group aimed to develop a cohesive township project in ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV v. ESPN Software India (P) Ltd. – Determination of Business Set-Up and Allowability of Revenue Expenditure under Sections 3(1) and 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the Case ESPN Software India (P) Ltd. was incorporated on 1 August 1995. This was the first assessment year for which the company filed its return, declaring a loss of Rs. 3,01,78,033. On 15 August ...

Royal Jordanian Airlines & Anr. v. Deputy Director of Income Tax: High Court of Delhi Dismissal Upon Withdrawal of Writ Petition with Liberty to Pursue Alternative Statutory Remedies Under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Royal Jordanian Airlines & Anr., approached the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by filing a Writ Petition designated as W.P.(C) 2113/2007 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

Sandeep Khetwani vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Scope of Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Against Section 264 Revisionary Orders Post-Search Block Assessment

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case:During a search and seizure operation conducted on April 18, 2002, a cash sum of $Rs. 3,20,000/-$ was recovered from the possession of the Petitioner. Following the block assessment, instead of filing...

M/s L.P. Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Depreciation Restriction on Assets Not Exclusively Used for Business under Sections 32(1) and 38(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company operated a restaurant and bar business. During Assessment Year 2001-02, it entered into an arrangement with M/s Moet’s Kababs. Under the arrangement, 85% of the daily...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XVII vs. M/S Max India Ltd. | Whether Sale of Assets to Employees Below Written Down Value (WDV) Constitutes a Taxable Perquisite Under Section 192 and Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee, M/s Max India Ltd., ran a corporate welfare scheme providing its officers with company-owned cars and hard furnishing items up to a designated budget. Under th...