In M/s
Indeutsch Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others, the
Allahabad High Court examined the legality of penalty proceedings initiated
under Section 129 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
The Allahabad High Court, in M/s BMR Enterprises
v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., examined the legality of a penalty
imposed under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017,
on account of a d...
The Delhi High Court, in Best Crop
Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Meerut &
Ors., considered a batch of writ petitions challenging orders passed under
Rule 86A of the Central Goo...
In Dinesh
Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Another, the
Allahabad High Court examined the legality of GST proceedings initiated solely
on the basis of alleged excess stock found during a su...
To
The Competent Authority
Office of the Comptroller & Auditor General of India
New DelhiSubject: Comprehensive Professional Representation on
Draft C&AG Empanelment Policy 2026–27 – Issues Affecting Smal...
Veena Arora v
Commissioner of Income Tax 12 Delhi and Another- W P C No 22 of 2026-Decision
dated 05 January 2026- High Court of DelhiCore
Issue:Whether a reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax...
The writ petition before the High Court of Tripura challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and assailed the order dated 17.05.2022 passed by the Assistan...
In many cases, assessees are confronted with tax demands solely on the ground that the credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) claimed by them is not fully or correctly reflected in Form 26AS, despite the fact that tax ha...
📚 *FULL BLOG ARCHIVE*
📌 Refundability of
Central Excise Duty on Unmanufactured Tobacco after Central Excise (Amendment)
Act, 2025 – Legal Position Explained
🔗 https://mytaxexpert.co.in/post....