Assessment under Section 153A vs Regular Assessment under Section 143(3): ITAT Delhi in Gurucharan Singh Hora v. DCIT on Jurisdiction, Search Assessments, and Addition under Section 69A

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 241
Read More »
The appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year 2020-21 arose from an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, confirming an assessment framed under Secti...

Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Beyond 1 April 2021 Held Time-Barred: ITAT Delhi Quashes Notice Under Section 148 Following Supreme Court Ruling in Rajeev Bansal

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 493
Read More »
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the Final Assessment Order dated 11 March 2025 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pursuant to the directions issued by the Dis...

Penalty under Section 270A Cannot Be Sustained on a Charge Different from the One Initiated: ITAT Delhi in Umri Pooph Pratappur Tollway Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 282
Read More »
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, arising from a penalty order imposed under Section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Ye...

Reassessment Based on Alleged Accommodation Entries Unsustainable Without Fresh Tangible Evidence: ITAT Delhi in DCIT vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 233
Read More »
The present appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, arose from reassessment proceedings initiated against the assessee company for Assessment Year 2011-12, wherein the Assessing Officer treated t...

Section 68 Cannot Be Invoked in Firm’s Hands for Capital and Loan Introduced by Identified Partners and Relatives: ITAT Delhi in ACIT vs Gurkirat BPO Services LLP (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 267
Read More »
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, whereby additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, aggregating to ₹13.16 crore, were deleted....

Religious Trust Entitled to Section 11 Exemption: Donations Cannot Be Treated as Advertisement Income – ITAT Delhi

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 205
Read More »
The assessee, Shri Krishna Janmashtmi Mahotsav Samiti, is a public charitable trust duly registered under Section 12A and also approved under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The trust is primarily engaged in ...

Assessment Order Passed Without Considering Assessee’s Reply Violates Principles of Natural Justice: ITAT Delhi Restores Matter for De Novo Assessment | Royalux Lighting LLP v. Assessment Unit (AY 2022-23)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
The appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the Assessment Year 2022-23. The assessee had originall...

Provision for Warranty Allowable Under Section 37 When Based on Scientific Method and Past Experience: ITAT Delhi in Marelli UM Electronic Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 187
Read More »
The present appeal was filed by Marelli UM Electronic Systems Private Limited agai nst the assessment order dated 28.10.2024 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pursuant to the directions issued b...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Survive When Quantum Appeal Is Pending: ITAT Delhi in Neetu Gupta vs Income Tax Officer (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 215
Read More »
The present appeal arose from an order dated 02 June 2025 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, whereby a penalty of ₹1,75,615 was confirmed u...

Revision under Section 263 Not Sustainable Where AO Takes a Plausible View on Bogus Purchases: ITAT Delhi in Axis Infoline Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT-1

Author
My Tax Expert
07/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 219
Read More »
The present appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench “B”, arose from a revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for As...