Section 74 GST Cannot Be Invoked Without Fraud or Suppression – ITC Allowed Despite Supplier Issues | Safecon Lifescience Case

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 517
Read More »
The Allahabad High Court examined the legality of proceedings initiated under Section 74 of the UPGST Act against the petitioner for availing Input Tax Credit on purchases made from a duly registered supplier at the time...

Constitutional Challenge to Section 16(2)(c) CGST Act – ITC Cannot Be Denied for Supplier Default | LGW Industries Case

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1008
Read More »
The writ petition filed before the Calcutta High Court assails the legality of proceedings seeking reversal of Input Tax Credit solely on the allegation that suppliers were subsequently found to be non-existent or had ob...

ITC Cannot Be Denied for Supplier’s Subsequent Registration Cancellation – Allahabad High Court | Khurja Scrap Trading Company Case

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 366
Read More »
In this landmark ruling, the Allahabad High Court reaffirmed that: Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied when the supplier was duly registered on the date of transaction, even if registration is cancelled subsequent...

GST ITC Cannot Be Denied Due to Suo Moto Retrospective Cancellation of Supplier’s Registration When Buyer Is Bona Fide – Calcutta High Court | M/s Gargo Traders v. Joint Commissioner, State Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 692
Read More »
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI (Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction) APPELLATE SIDEPresent: The Hon’ble Justice Krishna RaoWPA 1009 of 2022M/s. Gargo Traders Versus The Joint Commissioner,...

Separate GST Registration for Warehouses – Mandatory or Not? Detailed Analysis with AAR Maharashtra Ruling in Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. under CGST & IGST Acts

Author
CA. VAIBHAV RAI
21/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 518
Read More »
 Whether separate GST Registration is required for a warehouse?Getting registered under GST is the pre-eminent step for embarking on the journey of doing business. The registration under GST is compulsory...

Accumulation u/s 11(2) Cannot Be Denied for Vague Form 10 If Purpose Aligns With Trust Objects: Mumbai ITAT | Harmony Foundation v. ITO (Exemption) [TS-1673-ITAT-2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
21/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 384
Read More »
Accumulation under section 11(2) cannot be denied for vague Form 10 if purpose aligns with Trust’s objectiveMumbai ITAT allows Assessee’s (Trust) appeal and holds that accumulation of income under Section 11(2) canno...

Key amendments in PFRDA (Exits and Withdrawals under the NPS) Regulations, 2015

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 404
Read More »
Ministry of FinanceKey amendments in PFRDA (Exits and Withdrawals under the NPS) Regulations, 2015Amendments primarily aimed at the non-government sector, also rationalize provisions for government sectorMeasures to prov...

Validity of Reopening of Assessment and Addition under Section 69 without Rejection of Books

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 459
Read More »
Validity of Reopening of Assessment and Addition under Section 69 without Rejection of Books M/s KDP Infrastructure Private Limited v. DCITITAT Delhi | ITA No. 1094/Del/2024 | Order dated 12 December 2025 1...

Alleged Bogus Purchases: Deletion vs Remand Depends on Charging Provision — ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition u/s 69, ITAT Pune Orders Remand u/s 37 | KDP Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Taparia Tools Ltd. (2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 556
Read More »
Alleged Bogus Purchases – Divergent Legal Treatment Case 1:M/s KDP Infrastructure Private Limited v. DCITITAT Delhi | ITA No. 1094/Del/2024 | Order dated 12.12.2025 Case 2:ACIT, Circle-1 v. Taparia Tools ...

GAAR Not Applicable Without ‘Impermissible Avoidance Arrangement’: Telangana High Court Quashes GAAR Proceedings on Share Transactions | Smt. Anvida Bandi v. DCIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 726 (Telangana HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 345
Read More »
In recent judgement (September, 2025) Telangana High Court quashes GAAR proceedings in absence of an ‘impermissible avoidance arrangement’(IAA)In Smt. Anvida Bandi v Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, [2025] 177 taxm...