Facts of the
Case
Multiple Income Tax Appeals (ITA Nos. 1349/08 to 1354/08) were
filed by the assessee J. P. Gupta against the order dated
22.07.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
...
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals arose from a common
order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning the tax treatment
of licence fee payable to the Railways for use of land as a depot.T...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, J. P. Gupta, filed multiple income
tax appeals challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The
dispute centered on whether licence fee payable to the Railways for use of
...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, J. P. Gupta, filed multiple Income
Tax Appeals challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 22.07.2008.The core dispute related to licence fee payable
t...
Facts of the
Case
The appellant, J. P. Gupta, filed multiple income tax
appeals against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated
22.07.2008.
The core dispute involved licence fee payabl...
FACTS OF THE
CASE
The appellant, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., claimed deduction under
Section 80IA on income arising from:
Duty drawback
Profit from sale of REP licences
The Income Tax Appellate T...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Central Government) preferred a series of Income
Tax Appeals (ITAs) before the High Court of Delhi against various Public Sector
Undertakings (PSUs) belonging to the State Government (incl...
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, M/s Bhav Shakti Steel Mines Pvt. Ltd., is a
private limited company that received share application money in cash from
various share applicants. The Assessing Officer raised issues regar...
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court
against Bhasin Motors India Pvt. Ltd.
The appeals pertained to the financial years 1997-98 to 2001-02.
The total tax eff...
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue preferred several appeals against Bhasin Motors India
(P) Ltd. relating to Financial Years 1997-98 to 2001-02.
The cumulative tax effect involved in all appeals was approxim...