Facts of the Case·
The Commissioner of Income Tax
(Revenue) preferred two appeals, numbered ITA 84/2008
(pertaining to Assessment Year 2001-02) and ITA 85/2008
(...
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Profile & Claims: The assessee, a well-established
company, claimed statutory depreciation amounting to ₹9.31 Crores on its
various capital assets for the Assessment Y...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee filed income tax returns for the Assessment Years (AY)
1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-2002, which were originally processed under
Section 143(1) of the Income...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High
Court against the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in
respect of Assessment Years 1996-97 and 1997-98.During the hearing, couns...
1. Facts of the Case
The
Parties: The appeals involve the Revenue
(Commissioner of Income Tax) as the Appellant and M/s. Oswal Agro Mills
Ltd. along with M/s. Oswal Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. as...
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had rendered decisions in favour
of the assessee for Assessment Years 1989-90 to 1995-96.
No appeals were filed by the Revenue against those Tribunal o...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee filed its income tax returns for the Assessment Years
(AY) 1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-2002, which were initially processed
under Section 143(1) of the Inc...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee claimed a depreciation of ₹9.31 Crores for the
Assessment Year 1998-99 on its various capital assets.
This
claim included depreciation on its factory man...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee filed its original income tax returns for the
Assessment Years (AY) 1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-2002, which were
processed under Section 143(1) of the Inco...
Facts of the Case
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had passed orders in favour of
the assessee.
The Tribunal relied upon its earlier decisions concerning
Assessment Years 1989-90 to 1995-96.
No a...