Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
938,705
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bharti Cellular Ltd. (and Connected Appeals) – Delhi High Court: Whether Interconnection and Port Access Charges Paid by Telecom Operators Constitute "Fees for Technical Services" Under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Requiring Tax Deduction at Source (TDS)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 75
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Parties: The Appellants represent the Revenue Department (Commissioner of Income Tax). The Respondents/Assessees are various telecom companies (such as Bharti Cellular Ltd., Esco...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. [Respondent Name] – Appeal Dismissed for Want of Committee on Disputes (COD) Approval with Liberty to Refile Upon Clearance Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Income Tax Department) preferred an appeal (ITA No. 71/2009) before the High Court of Delhi against the respondent assessment order/tribunal order. Alongside the main appeal, a miscellaneo...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Cellular Ltd. (with Escotel Mobile Communications Ltd. & Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd.) – Whether Interconnect, Port, and Access Charges Paid by Telecom Operators Constitute "Fees for Technical Services" (FTS) Liable for TDS under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondents/assessees are telecom companies providing cellular mobile telephone services to subscribers within their respective circles assigned by the Department of Telecommunic...

JAL HOTELS CO. LTD. VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (WITH CIT VS. SUDHIR ENGINEERING CO.) — DELHI HIGH COURT ORDERS QUASHING OF SECTION 148 REASSESSMENT NOTICES BASED ON IMPERMISSIBLE CHANGE OF OPINION IN THE ABSENCE OF NEW TANGIBLE MATERIAL WHEN PRIMARY FACTS WERE ALREADY DISCLOSED

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Jal Hotels Company Ltd., filed its income tax returns along with copies of four distinct agreements entered into with Sunair Hotel Ltd., namely: ·     ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharat Glass Tube Ltd: Can Income Disclosed in a Return Filed Under Section 139(4) After Search Be Treated as Undisclosed Income Under Section 158BB When Tax Audit Report and Self-Assessment Tax Were Already Submitted?

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the Case Search Operations: On July 8, 1999, a search under Section 132(1) was executed on a third party, M/s Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd. During this operation, incriminating materials/papers be...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bharti Cellular Ltd. (And Other Connected Appeals): Whether Interconnection, Port Access, and Toll Charges Paid by Telecom Operators to MTNL/BSNL Constitute 'Fees for Technical Services' (FTS) Requiring Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) Under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the Case Nature of Business: The respondents/assessees are telecommunication service companies engaged in providing cellular telephone facilities to subscribers within specified license circl...

Jal Hotels Co. Ltd. vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax & CIT vs. Sudhir Engineering Co. | Delhi High Court Reaffirms Kelvinator Principle: Reassessment Under Sections 147/148 Cannot Be Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without Fresh Tangible Material

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         Jal Hotels Co. Ltd. Cases: The Petitioner, Jal Hotels Co. Ltd., filed its income tax returns along with copies of four distinct business agreements...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Cellular Ltd. (And Other Connected Appeals): Determination of "Fees for Technical Services" Under Section 194J vs. Automatic Telecommunication Interconnect and Port Access Charges

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the Case Business Profile: The respondents/assessees are telecommunication companies engaged in the business of providing cellular telephone services to subscribers within their designated se...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VI, New Delhi vs. Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited: Whether Estimated Administrative Expenses Incurred on Modernization and Capacity Expansion of Existing Business Units Constitute Allowable Revenue Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Despite Capitalization in Books of Accounts

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee (M/s Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited) is engaged in the sugar business operating multiple units, including manufacturing units located at Deoband...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited | Characterization of Business Expansion and Administrative Expenses under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act: Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure on Interlaced Existing Business Units

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee, M/s Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacturing sugar across multiple manufacturing units, including units situated at Deo...