Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
939,621
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect Under CBDT Instruction No. 5/2008 | ITA No. 681/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The matter came up along with several connected appeals. The Court examined the maintainabil...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. [Name of Assessee Not Available in Uploaded Order] – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Instruction No. 5/2008 (ITA No. 332/2009 and Connected Matters)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe matter concerned a batch of Income Tax Appeals, including ITA No. 430/2009, ITA No. 680/2009, ITA No. 681/2009, ITA No. 328/2009 and ITA No. 332/2009. The Revenue preferred the appeals befo...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central)-I vs. Assessee/Petitioner – Demand Notice Cannot Be Enforced Until Appeal Effect Orders Are Passed | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Income Tax Department issued a demand notice dated 15 January 2009. The notice sought recovery of tax demands for Assessment Years 1989-90 to 2004-05. The petitioner had already p...

Meena Chaudhary vs Income Tax Authorities & Others | Delhi High Court Directs Action Against Company for Failure to Deposit TDS Deducted from Rent| under section Section 148

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ms. Meena Chaudhary, had let out the third floor of premises known as Vikas Tower, Delhi-110085, measuring approximately 2900 sq. ft., to M/s Bitcom Services Pvt. Ltd. through its Dir...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee – Deletion of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Bona Fide Revision of Bad Debt Claim | Delhi High Court| under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2003-04 declaring a loss of ₹23,93,863. In the return, the assessee claimed bad debts amounting to ₹87,14,984.During the assessment proc...

Director of Income Tax vs. Sheraton International Inc. | Taxability of Global Hotel Reservation and Marketing Fees under India-USA DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Status: The assessee, Sheraton International Inc., is a non-resident company incorporated under the laws of the USA, specializing in providing comprehensive operational, ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Name Not Reflected in Available Order) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect | ITA No. 734/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During the proceedings, it was acknowledged that the tax effect involved in the m...

CIT vs. Smt. Bimla Devi: Whether Addition Based on 'Accommodation Entry' Claim Survives if Primary Case is Set Aside

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Income Tax Department) preferred statutory appeals before the High Court of Delhi under the relevant appellate provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. These appeals, registered as ITA Nos....

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Yamaha Motor India Pvt. Ltd. | Depreciation on Discarded Assets under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company, Yamaha Motor India Pvt. Ltd., claimed depreciation during Assessment Years 2000-01 and 2001-02 on assets that had been written off. The assets had originally been capitalized at ...