Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
941,332
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Digember Jain Society for Child Welfare vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) | Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) Cannot Be Denied on Mere Apprehension of Future Non-Educational Activities | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
13/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner, Digember Jain Society for Child Welfare (Regd.), was established in 1969 and registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Since its inception, the ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I vs. Banaras House Limited | Whether Non-Compete Fee is a Capital Receipt and Whether Revision under Section 263 Can Be Invoked When the Assessing Officer Has Taken a Plausible View

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 111
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case relates to the assessment year 2002-03. The respondent/assessee was engaged in marketing diesel generator sets manufactured by M/s. Wartsila Corporation of Helsinki, Finland. The assessee and...

Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Cellular Handsets Issued to Dealers, Capital vs Revenue Expenditure, Depreciation on Marketing Assets, Provision for Obsolescence & Remand to ITAT under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., filed income tax returns for Assessment Years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The cases were selected for scrutiny and notices were issued under Section 142 of the Income-tax ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee Tax Effect Below Monetary Threshold Limits for Filing Appeals Before the High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a series of interconnected income tax appeals (ITA No. 962/2009, ITA No. 963/2009, ITA No. 993/2009, and ITA No. 1004/2009) alongside miscellaneous applications before the Hon’b...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. [Respondent Name] | Tax Effect Below Monitory Limits & Concurrent Findings of Fact under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant (Revenue) preferred multiple Income Tax Appeals (ITA No. 962/2009, ITA No. 963/2009, ITA No. 993/2009, and ITA No. 1004/2009 along with connected Civil Miscellaneous applications) before ...

Petitioner vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. – Adjustment of Income Tax Refund Against Subsequent Assessment Demand Pending Stay Application | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 95
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), by its order dated 23.09.2008, decided appeals relating to Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 in favour of the assessee. Consequently, substantial refund amo...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Low Tax Effect and Concurrent Findings of Fact | ITA Nos. 962/2009, 963/2009, 993/2009 & 1004/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the hearing, it was brought to the notice of the...

Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer | Delhi High Court on Marketing Expenditure, Depreciation on Cellular Handsets, Inventory Obsolescence and Remand of Non-Speaking ITAT Order under the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNokia India Pvt. Ltd. filed income tax returns for Assessment Years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The cases were selected for scrutiny and notices were issued under Section 142 of the Income-tax Act. Assessment...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee – Penalty Proceedings Cannot Survive After Deletion of Quantum Addition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 138
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer made certain additions during assessment proceedings. Based on those additions, penalty proceedings were initiated against the assessee. The Income Ta...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs. M/s Eicher Ltd. (2009) – Taxability of Accrued Interest on Irrecoverable Inter-Corporate Deposits under the Real Income Theory

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Eicher Ltd. had advanced Inter-Corporate Deposits to M/s Lottee Holdings (P) Ltd. The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹68,25,000 towards interest allegedly accrued on such deposits on the g...