Aashna Singhal vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Section 83 CGST Act – Provisional Attachment Ceases After One Year

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Aashna Singhal, challenged a provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, whereby her bank account maintained with AU Small Finance Bank was attached on 27.01.2...

Konica Singhal vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Ors. – Provisional Attachment under Section 83 CGST Act Ceases After One Year | Delhi High Court (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Konica Singhal, challenged a provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, whereby her bank account maintained with Yes Bank Ltd. was attached.The attachment ord...

Aashna Singhal vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Ors – Provisional Attachment under Section 83 CGST Act Ceases After One Year | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged a provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, whereby her bank account maintained with ICICI Bank was attached.The at...

Vaibhav Singhal vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Ors (2024) – Provisional Attachment under Section 83 CGST Act Ceases After One Year | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vaibhav Singhal, challenged a provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, whereby his bank account maintained with AU Small Finance Bank was attached on 27.01...

M/s Hari Enterprises vs Superintendent, Range 25, CGST Model Town Division (Delhi High Court, 2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Hari Enterprises, challenged the order dated 10.01.2024 whereby its GST registration was cancelled by the department.The petitioner contended that although a Show Cause Notice dated...

Visiontek Engineers vs Commissioner of SGST Delhi & Anr. (2024) – Retrospective GST Cancellation Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order under Section 29(2) CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Visiontek Engineers, engaged in the business of air conditioning services and trading, challenged the order dated 23.07.2022 cancelling its GST registration retrospectively from 01.07.2...

Future Generali India Insurance Company Ltd. vs Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward 203 & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner challenged an Order-in-Original dated 29.04.2024 arising from a Show Cause Notice dated 24.12.2023. The demand of approximately ₹7.02 crores (including penalty) w...

Kalpatru Industries vs Commissioner SGST Delhi & Anr. (2024) – Retrospective GST Cancellation Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order under Section 29 CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Kalpatru Industries, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), was registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner applied for cancellation of GST registration on 06...

SK Creations vs Commissioner of Central Tax & GST (Delhi West) – Refund Rejection Set Aside Due to INR Export Realization | Delhi High Court (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, SK Creations, challenged the Order-in-Appeal dated 07.03.2023, which upheld the Order-in-Original dated 10.06.2022. The original authority had partially sanctioned the refund claim whi...

Tata Motors Limited vs Goods and Service Tax Officer (GSTO) Ward 203 & Ors. – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Non-Speaking GST Order for Lack of Application of Mind (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, challenged an order dated 30.04.2024 passed by the GST authorities under Section 73 of the CGST Act for Financial Year 2018–19, whereby a demand of ₹23.82 crore...