GST Goods Detention for Route Deviation Unsustainable Without Proof of Tax Evasion — Section 129 Penalty Set Aside by Karnataka High Court | M/s. Hysum Steel v. JCCT (Appeals) (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 880
Read More »
Goods detention for alleged route deviation despite valid invoice-s.129 penalty set aside for lack of evasion proof KARNATAKA HIGH COURT-M/s. Hysum Steel Versus The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal...

Ex-parte GST Adjudication and Cancellation of Registration Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice — Karnataka High Court | D.V. Constructions v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 571
Read More »
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - petitioner had failed to file his monthly returns for a continues period of six months - adjudication order passed without granting an opportunity of personal hearing t...

Parallel GST Proceedings Barred under Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act — Karnataka High Court Quashes State GST Order | M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1280
Read More »
Parallel GST proceedings on same show-cause notice u/s6(2)(b) barred; State GST order quashed, writ allowed.KARNATAKA HIGH COURT- M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India & Ors. Writ Petition No. 7050 of 2025...

Sponsorship Payments for ICC Brand Usage Treated as Royalty: Delhi High Court Upholds 15% TDS under Section 195 – LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. v. DIT (International Taxation) [2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 550
Read More »
The writ petition was filed by LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. challenging the order passed under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby permission sought under Section 195 for remittance of payments to Global Cr...

Sanction for Prosecution under Section 276B Cannot Be Mechanical Where TDS Is Paid with Interest – Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Sanction in M/s GM Infinite Dwelling India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. VersusThe Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Bengaluru & Anr.

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 651
Read More »
Sanction for Prosecution under Section 276B r/w Section 278B — Requirement of Application of Mind, Reasonable Cause, and Limits of Criminalisation of TDS Defaults Karnataka High Court:-M/s GM Infinite Dwelling ...

Stock-in-Trade of Jeweller Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Cannot Be Seized Under Sections 132/132A – Bombay High Court Orders Unconditional Release | Mahavir Jewellers NX LLP v. DDIT (Inv.) (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 405
Read More »
Stock-in-Trade Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Not Liable to SeizureThe Bombay High Court held that stock-in-trade of a jeweller, duly recorded in the books of account and explained through co...

Depreciation on Block of Assets Cannot Be Denied for Non-Use of Individual Units – Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CIT v. Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. (AY 2003-04)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 405
Read More »
Depreciation on Block of Assets Not Deniable Due to Non-Use of Certain Units During the Relevant Assessment YearThe Madras High Court held that depreciation allowable on a block of assets cannot be denied merely because ...

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Health Security se National Security (HSNS) Cess Act, 2026 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

Author
CA DR VINAY MITTAL
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 641
Read More »
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Health Security se National Security (HSNS) Cess Act, 2026 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026Posted On: 02 JAN 2026 5:03PM by PIB DelhiQ1. Who is required to get registered under the HSNS Ces...

Section 68 Addition Unsustainable Where Bank Trail & PAN Established: Patna High Court in Rajnandani Projects (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 892
Read More »
Background and FactsThe Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹1.91 crore under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, treating the amount as unexplained cash credit. The assessee furnished complete documentary evid...

Supreme Court Holds Non-Compete Fee as Allowable Revenue Expenditure under the Income-tax Act (Sharp Business System v. CIT-III, 2025 INSC 1481)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 914
Read More »
FactsThe assessee, Sharp Business System, paid a non-compete fee to another corporate entity pursuant to a commercial arrangement restricting the latter from engaging in competing business activities for a specified peri...