Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed a batch of writ petitions under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of
Delhi. The challenge was directed against an order dated January 22, 2010...
Facts of the Case
The
Tribunal had set aside an assessment on the ground that the notice under
Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was served belatedly, beyond the
prescribed one-year limitation.
U...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue filed three appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
against a common order dated 24th July, 2009 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessmen...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed two Income Tax Appeals before the
Delhi High Court. During consideration of the appeals, it was noted that the
combined tax effect involved in both matters was less than ₹10 lakh. ...
Facts of the Case:
The petitioner, CIT, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the assessment year 2005-06 for A.K. Steel Pvt.
Ltd. The dispute revolves around the alleged concealm...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue filed three appeals against a common order dated 24th July, 2009,
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeals cover
Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 (ITA ...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue/Appellant preferred Income Tax Appeals
before the Delhi High Court under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.At the time of consideration, the Court noted that
the combined tax effec...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Akshya Kumar, challenged the imposition of a
penalty by the Income Tax Department under the provisions of the Income Tax
Act. The dispute arose in the context of ITA 875/2008, where the...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue filed three appeals against a common order dated 24th July, 2009,
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeals cover
Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 (ITA ...
Facts of the Case:The appellant, CIT (Commissioner of Income Tax),
challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that allowed
certain deductions claimed by the respondent, Khandelwal Construction Co....