Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

M/s Lachman Dass Bhatia Hingwala (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Landmark Ruling on the Statutory Power of the ITAT to Recall its Own Final Order in Entirety to Rectify Manifest Errors Under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed a batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Delhi. The challenge was directed against an order dated January 22, 2010...

Sunil Sharma vs Income Tax Officer – Belated Notice under Section 143(2) & 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Tribunal had set aside an assessment on the ground that the notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was served belatedly, beyond the prescribed one-year limitation. U...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals on Low Tax Effect Below ₹10 Lakhs | ITA Nos. 285/2010 & 331/2010 (2011)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed two Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court. During consideration of the appeals, it was noted that the combined tax effect involved in both matters was less than ₹10 lakh. ...

CIT vs. A.K. Steel Pvt. Ltd.: Delhi High Court ITA No. 902/2009 Analysis – Section 143(3), Income Tax Act Matters

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The petitioner, CIT, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the assessment year 2005-06 for A.K. Steel Pvt. Ltd. The dispute revolves around the alleged concealm...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Televenture Ltd. – Delhi High Court Judgement on Deletion of Interest Disallowance Under Section 36(1)(iii) and Applicability of Commercial Expediency for Interest-Free Advances to Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries out of Mixed Common Funds

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed three appeals against a common order dated 24th July, 2009, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeals cover Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 (ITA ...

[Appellant Name] vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) | ITA Nos. 285/2010 & 331/2010 | Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect Below ₹10 Lakhs

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue/Appellant preferred Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.At the time of consideration, the Court noted that the combined tax effec...

Akshya Kumar vs. Income Tax Department – Delhi High Court ITA 875/2008, Penalty Dispute under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Akshya Kumar, challenged the imposition of a penalty by the Income Tax Department under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose in the context of ITA 875/2008, where the...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Televenture Ltd. – Delhi High Court Judgement on Deletion of Interest Disallowance Under Section 36(1)(iii) and Applicability of Commercial Expediency for Interest-Free Advances to Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries out of Mixed Common Funds

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed three appeals against a common order dated 24th July, 2009, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeals cover Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 (ITA ...

CIT vs Khandelwal Construction Co. – Delhi High Court 2011 | ITA No. 136/2009 | Section 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The appellant, CIT (Commissioner of Income Tax), challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that allowed certain deductions claimed by the respondent, Khandelwal Construction Co....