Facts of the Case
The assessee was
responsible for deducting tax at source on payments made, including salary
components involving expatriate employees.
During assessment
proceedings, certain short...
Facts of the CaseThe
assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008–09, which was
initially accepted under Section 143(1). Thereafter, the Assessing Officer
initiated reassessment proceedings under Sec...
Facts of the CaseThe
Revenue, through the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6, instituted
multiple income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court against Nazar Trading
Pvt. Ltd. However, during the course of hearin...
Facts of the
Case
The respondent company was engaged in the business of providing
telecommunication services and related value-added services.
Initially, telecom licences had been granted pursuant to agreement...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue
had instituted three income tax appeals against Aggarwal Plasto Chem (P) Ltd.
before the Delhi High Court. At the hearing stage, it was brought to the
Court’s notice by the Revenue’s c...
Facts of the
Case
The respondent companies were engaged in telecommunication and
value-added services businesses.
Initially, licences were granted under agreements executed in 1994.
Under the 1994 telecom re...
Facts of the
CaseSearch and seizure proceedings under Section 132 of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 were conducted on 31 January 2008 against the MDLR
Group. Notices under Section 153A were subsequently issued requiring fil...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue
had instituted three income tax appeals against Aggarwal Plasto Chem (P) Ltd.
before the Delhi High Court. At the hearing stage, it was brought to the
Court’s notice by the Revenue’s c...
Facts of the
CaseSearch and seizure operations under Section 132 of
the Income Tax Act were conducted on 31 January 2008 against the MDLR Group and
its associated entities. Several notices under Section 153A were subs...