Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Raghunath Enterprises, challenged
the Order‑in‑Original No. 83/ADC/D.N./Shaukat Ali Nurvi/2024‑25 dated 27
January 2025 passed by the Respondent, Additional Commissioner, CGST...
Facts of the Case:The Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi South
(“Petitioner”) appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, dated 30 July 2024, which...
FACTS OF THE CASEThe Petitioner, Raman Enterprises, filed Writ
Petition (Civil) 1349 of 2025 challenging an impugned order dated
30.12.2023 issued by the Respondent, Commissioner of SGST Delhi,
which confirmed a deman...
Facts of the CasePetitioner Samyak Jain challenged the impugned order
dated 31 January 2025 passed by the Superintendent (Adjudication),
Central GST, Delhi, demanding over Rs. 48 crore from him under the
GST regime. T...
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner — M/s K.K. Construction Co., through its
proprietor — filed Writ Petition No. 12943/2025 under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India challenging:
The Show
Cause Notice (SC...
FACTS OF THE CASEM/S MRK Infra (“Petitioner”), a GST‑registered entity, filed
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13185/2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India challenging:
Show
Cause Notice (SCN) dat...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/S Ahlcons India
Pvt. Ltd., a construction and works contract service provider registered under
Service Tax regime, faced multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by the GST
Departme...
FACTS OF THE CASE
These
consolidated appeals arise from multiple service tax matters (including SERTA
5/2024, 7/2024, 8/2024, 9/2024 and 10/2024), where the Commissioner
of Service Tax/CGST (Departmen...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Service Tax/CGST (Appellants) challenged
the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) order which
had dealt with the question whether amounts paid by Indian e...
Facts of the CaseChegg India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter “the Petitioner”) is an
Indian company providing IT, content, software and related services to its
overseas parent (Chegg Inc., USA). The Petitioner sought refund...