Globe Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of DGST & Ors. – Delhi HC Clarifies Principles of Natural Justice & Remands GST Demand Order for Re Hearing

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 125
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Globe Overseas Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition challenging: The impugned order dated 24 August 2024 issued by the Sales Tax Officer (DGST Ward‑63, Zone‑6, Delhi), rais...

Sight and Sound India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of SGST & Anr. – Ex-Parte GST Order Set Aside Due to Non-Communication of SCN under Section 73 and Violation of Natural Justice

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 134
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner challenged the adjudication order dated 05.03.2024 passed by SGST authorities for FY 2018–19, raising a demand of ₹9,77,618. A Show Cause Notice dated 08.12.202...

Sight and Sound India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of SGST & Anr.: Ex-Parte GST Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice Due to Improper Service of SCN

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the: Show Cause Notice dated 27.09.2023 Reminder Notice dated 10.11.2023 Assessment Order dated 20.11.2023 The dispute pertained to GST demand for the...

Maintainability of Writ Petition Against GST Show Cause Notice – Availability of Alternative Remedy under GST Law | Natraj Enterprises v. Commissioner of DGST (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 235
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Natraj Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued by the GST authorities. The grievance of the peti...

CGST, Delhi West vs. Vishal Goyal: Bail in ₹831 Crore GST Evasion Case Not Liable to Recall in Absence of Perversity or Misuse

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 221
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case originated from secret intelligence regarding an unregistered gutka manufacturing unit operating in Rohini, Delhi. A search was conducted on 01.01.2021 under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, whe...

M/s Fone Zone NXT vs Commissioner of DGST & Anr.: Delhi HC Upholds Ex Parte GST Assessment Orders and Rejects Blame on Chartered Accountant

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
Facts of the Case:M/s Fone Zone NXT (Proprietor: Mr. Gaurav Madan) obtained GST registration on 1 July 2017 and engaged in the sale of mobile phones and accessories. The petitioner regularly filed returns and had the G...

Principal Commissioner, CGST Delhi South Commissionerate v. M/s Bureau of Energy Efficiency

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 193
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The dispute primarily related to taxability of services and...

Principal Commissioner of CGST vs. M/s Pro-Interactive Services India Pvt. Ltd. – Scope of Service Tax Liability on Composite Service Activities

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent company was engaged in providing multiple taxable services including security services, manpower supply, and construction-related services. The dispute arose from a service tax demand ...

Teekam Singh vs. Income Tax Officer: Appeal under Section 147 & 144 for AY 2011-12 - Non-cooperation due to Imprisonment and Restoration of Appeal for Re-adjudication

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 202
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The appeal concerns the assessment for the year 2011-12 of Sh. Teekam Singh against the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-5(2)(4), Noida, with respect to proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the ...

Anil Kumar HUF vs ITO, Karnal – Delay in Filing Form 10-IE Due to Technical Glitch Cannot Deny Benefit u/s 115BAC (ITAT Delhi)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Anil Kumar HUF, filed its return of income for AY 2021–22 and intended to opt for the concessional tax regime under Section 115BAC. However, the prescribed Form 10-IE was not filed wit...