Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
925,316
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Shri Shyam Sales: Delhi High Court Reaffirms Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 260A, Dismissing Revenue's Income Tax Appeal on Settled Law by Relying Upon CIT vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
20/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant in this matter, the Revenue (represented by the Commissioner of Income Tax), formally instituted two interconnected statutory appeals, designated as ITA Nos. 94/2004 and 49/2004, before t...

Shri Shyam Sales v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax: High Court Reaffirms Judicial Discipline and Binding Precedents Under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Shri Shyam Sales, filed writ petitions before the High Court of Delhi challenging certain impugned orders passed by the income tax authorities. The core grievance stemmed from the A...

Search and Seizure under the Income-tax Act, 2025 – Legal Framework

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Search and Seizure under the Income-tax Act, 2025 – Legal FrameworkIntroductionSections 247 to 259 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 contain the provisions relating to search, seizure, requisition, retention and applicati...

M/s Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Validity of Special Audit under Section 142(2A) Despite Tax Audit under Section 44AB

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., was engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of audio cassettes, video cassettes, compact discs, television-related products and allied co...

Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs Income-tax Appellate Tribunal & Others (Delhi High Court): Whether ITAT Can Admit Additional Grounds of Appeal Without Recording Reasons – Rule 11 of ITAT Rules Explained

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue had filed several appeals before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Years 1991-92 to 1995-96. During the pendency of those appeals, the Revenue sought permission to r...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II & Anr. vs M/s Rahuljee & Co. (2000) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Not Leviable Where Explanation is Bona Fide

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee obtained an export order for supply of imported video cassettes to Czechoslovakia. It secured an import licence for importing video cassettes from a Korean company in Semi Knocked Down (S...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs M/s Delhi Cattle Breeding Farms (P) Ltd. – Capital Gains on Agricultural Land to be Included for Section 104 Dividend Distribution Test | Sections 104 & 109 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 111
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-company was a private limited company engaged in agricultural and dairy farming activities. For Assessment Years 1974-75 and 1975-76, the company did not declare dividends despite having ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs Kelvinator of India Ltd. (Now Whirlpool of India Ltd.) – Reassessment under Section 147 Cannot Be Based on Mere Change of Opinion

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kelvinator of India Ltd. (now Whirlpool of India Ltd.), filed its return for Assessment Year 1987-88 claiming expenditure incurred on maintenance of guest houses situated in Delhi, Bomba...

Dr. Nalini Mahajan vs Director of Income Tax (Investigation) – Delhi High Court on Jurisdiction of Additional Director to Authorise Search under Section 132

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 123
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA group of writ petitions was filed by Dr. Nalini Mahajan, Ram Lal Mahajan Charitable Trust, PAN Foods Ltd., Mahajan Industries Pvt. Ltd., and related parties challenging the legality of search and se...

Orissa Cement Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Another – Challenge to Revision Proceedings under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Orissa Cement Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court seeking issuance of a writ of prohibition against the Commissioner of Income Tax. The petitioner sought to restrai...