Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,203,157
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Confiscation Under Section 130 Quashed for Bypassing Section 129(6): Karnataka High Court Allows M/S. Sreelakshmi Transport vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals) (Writ Petition No. 105057 of 2023 (T-RES) with WP No. 102770 of 2022), Orders Refund

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case On 08.09.2020, a vehicle carrying arecanut belonging to the transporter, M/S. Sreelakshmi Transport (proprietor Manjunath, GSTIN 32BOQPN8124M2ZE), was intercepted and detained in Karnataka under Sectio...

GST Registration Cancellation Petition for Default in Tax Payment Disposed of on Consent by Applying an Earlier Coordinate Ruling Without Independent Reasoning: Uttarakhand High Court Decides the Matter in Terms of Its Judgment in M/s Rana Building Material Supplier vs Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate (WPMS No.3005 of 2023, Following WPMS No.2382 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner in WPMS No.3005 of 2023 before the High Court of Uttarakhand challenged an order dated 01.03.2023 by which its Goods and Services Tax registration was cancelled for default in payment of...

High Court Cannot Use Writ Jurisdiction to Extend the Statutory Limitation for a First Appeal Under Section 107 of the GST Act Where the Appellate Authority Has No Power to Condone Delay: Kerala High Court Upholds Denial of Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(2)(c) and Dismisses the Writ Petition in Chattanchal Super Market vs Union of India and Others (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 34308 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Chattanchal Super Market, a registered partnership having its office at Chattanchal, Kasaragod, Kerala, represented by its Managing Partner Mohammed Kunhi Abdul Nisar, challenged an app...

Order-in-Original Set Aside for Denial of Three Personal Hearings: Telangana High Court Allows M/s. VPR Mining Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Writ Petition No. 32041 of 2023) — CBEC's 10.03.2017 Natural Justice Guidelines Enforced

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s. VPR Mining Infrastructure Private Limited filed Writ Petition No. 32041 of 2023 before the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, challenging an Order-in-Original No. 28/GST/2023-24-A...

Mechanically Issued and Vague Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice Lacking Material Particulars Cannot Be Sustained: Telangana High Court Quashes a Demand Exceeding Rs.218 Crore While Reserving the Department's Liberty to Reissue a Proper Notice in M/s. Glaxosmithkline Consumer Health Care Limited, Now Hindustan Unilever Limited, vs Deputy Commissioner (State Tax), Malkajgiri (Writ Petition No.34139 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s. Glaxosmithkline Consumer Health Care Limited (presently known as M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited), represented by its Manager (Indirect Taxation) at Kompally, Medchal-Malkajgiri, T...

Constitutional Challenge to the Input Tax Credit Time-Limit Under Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act Not Pressed by the Assessee: Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, Relegates the Petitioner to the Statutory Appellate Remedy While Protecting Limitation in Shashi Electricals vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Others (Writ Petition No. 102606 of 2022, T-RES)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Shashi Electricals, a proprietary concern represented by its proprietor Shashidar S/o Mahalingappa Nakati and holding GSTIN 29ACGPN5131R1ZZ, filed a writ petition before the Dharwad Ben...

Personal Hearing Is Mandatory: Allahabad High Court Quashes and Remits a Section 73 UP GST Assessment Order for Violating the Statutory Right to Personal Hearing Under Section 75(4) in M/S K.D. Enterprises vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1313 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S K.D. Enterprises, filed this writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an assessment order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, State Tax Sector-10...

Beneficial GST Circular Dated 2.1.2023 Governing Wrong-GSTIN Input Tax Credit Mismatches Must Be Extended Even During Pendency of Litigation: Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Appellate Order and Remands the Section 73 UPGST Act Demand Arising From a Dual-GSTIN Migration Error in M/S Santosh Kumar vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 and Another (Writ Tax No. 1185 of 2022 with Writ Tax No. 1193 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Santosh Kumar, was earlier registered under the pre-GST regime under the trade name M/s Akash Enterprises — holding TIN No.09278704481S under the VAT Act and registration No.A...

Premature Petition Dismissed: Telangana High Court Declines to Interfere in Delayed GST Registration Cancellation Appeal, Directing the Appellate Authority to Decide in Accordance With Law in Mohd Sidiq (M/s Mohd Sadiq Contractor) vs Joint Commissioner (Appeals-1), GST and Central Tax (Writ Petition No. 31458 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Mohd Sidiq, proprietor of M/s Mohd Sadiq Contractor, GSTIN 36EESP8378B1ZP, Jangaon, Telangana, filed this writ petition before the Telangana High Court against the Joint Commissioner (A...