Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
926,862
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Delta Foods Pvt. Ltd.: Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure on Factory Repairs under Section 37(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessment Context: The dispute arose during the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1997-98. The respondent-assessee, M/s Delta Foods Pvt. Ltd., filed its regular ret...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Tools India P. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Loss Assessments & Precedent of Aditya Chemicals

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT Ruling: The dispute originated when the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed an order in favor of the respondent-assessee, M/S Tools India P. Ltd., effectively deleti...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Bharat Gears Ltd. – Whether Excise Duty is to be Excluded from Total Turnover for Deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute concerned the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC of ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Tools India P. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Loss Assessments & Precedent of Aditya Chemicals

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT Ruling: The dispute originated when the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed an order in favor of the respondent-assessee, M/S Tools India P. Ltd., effectively deleti...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Mittal Corporation: Whether Commission Earned by Buying Agents from Foreign Enterprises via Commercial Knowledge and Experience is Eligible for Tax Deduction Under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Independent of Rendering Technical Services

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The Respondent-Assessee (M/s. Mittal Corporation) is a registered partnership firm resident in India acting as buying agents for foreign business enterprises, namely M/s. G.J. Coles ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Mittal Corporation: Interpretation of Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Regarding Deductions on Commission Earned from Foreign Enterprises for Providing Commercial Knowledge, Experience, and Skill

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee, M/s. Mittal Corporation, is a registered partnership firm and a resident in India. The assessee acted as a buying agent for foreign enterprises, specifica...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II, Delhi vs. M/s Mayar India Limited: Jurisdictional Mandate of Recording Prior Satisfaction in the Assessment Order under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as a Prerequisite Condition for the Lawful Initiation of Penalty Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessment and Penalty Initiation: The matter originated from assessment proceedings conducted by the Assessing Officer (AO) against the assessee, M/s Mayar India Limited. While ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Tigar Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Assessed Loss Cases | Delhi High Court (ITA No. 482/2006)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) whereby the Tribunal had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had t...

M/S GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax, Delhi IV — Whether Rental Expenditure Incurred on Maintaining a Transit Guest House is Mandatorily Disallowed Under the Non-Obstante Provisions of Section 37(4) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, Overriding the General Deduction Provisions for Business Premises Under Section 30

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s GKN Driveline (India) Ltd., incurred an expenditure of ₹3,07,167/- towards rent for an accommodation maintained and utilized as a "transit house" (guest house) during the assessment...

Saswati Dev vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – Burden of Proof to Rebut Presumptive Income Under Section 44AE of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Saswati Dev, was engaged in the business of operating goods carriages. During assessment proceedings, the assessee claimed that the actual income earned from the goods carriage business w...