Delhi High Court: Reassessment Notices Invalid Without Approval of Specified Authority under Sections 148, 148A & 151 of the Income Tax Act – Twylight Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. ITO Ward 25(3) Delhi & Ors. (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMultiple writ petitions were filed before the Delhi High Court challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18.The petitioners had ...

Delhi High Court: Reassessment Notice Invalid Without Approval of “Specified Authority” under Section 151 – Twylight Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v ITO (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMultiple writ petitions were filed before the Delhi High Court challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18.The petitioners had ...

Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Due to Lack of Mandatory Approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act – Twylight Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO Ward 25(3), Delhi & Ors. (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners challenged reassessment notices issued by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18.The reassessment proceedings were initiated by the Assessing Officer allegi...

Income Tax Office vs Anil Tuteja & Ors: Delhi High Court Upholds Territorial Jurisdiction Principles in Section 482 Petition Challenging Return of Complaint in Tax Evasion & Conspiracy Case

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASEIn CRL.M.C.2757/2023, the Income Tax Office (petitioner/complainant) challenged an order dated 06.04.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), Tis Hazari Courts, Delh...

PCIT-4 vs Mohak Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Revision u/s 263 Invalid When AO Conducted Enquiry | ITA 730/2023 | Section 263 of Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case arose from revision proceedings initiated by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the assessee company, Mohak Real Estate Pvt. ...

Printing and Binding of Books Treated as Manufacturing Activity Eligible for Deduction u/s 80IC – PCIT vs Nirja Publishers & Printers Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company, Nirja Publishers & Printers Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the business of printing, publishing, and binding of books. The company claimed deduction under Section 80IC of the Incom...

Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-6 vs Nirja Publishers & Printers Pvt. Ltd.: Delhi HC Upholds Deduction Under Section 80IC & Rejects Section 40(a)(ia) Addition — No Substantial Question of Law

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASEThe appeals arise from two connected appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-6 (“Revenue”) against orders of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (...

PCIT vs Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Sales Tax Incentive Held Capital Receipt | Income Tax Case Law

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 83
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., established industrial units in the State of Maharashtra and received sales tax incentive/subsidy under the Maharashtra Package Scheme of Incentives...

RTI Cannot Override Income Tax Confidentiality: Delhi High Court Sets Aside CIC Order on PM CARES Fund Disclosure – CPIO/Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax vs Girish Mittal (2024) Delhi HC

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent filed an RTI application seeking information regarding PM CARES Fund, including copies of documents submitted for obtaining income-tax exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, ...

Sales Tax Subsidy Under Maharashtra Package Scheme of Incentives Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable – Delhi High Court in CIT-IV v. Indo Rama Textiles Ltd. (ITA 392/2014)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, M/s Indo Rama Textiles Ltd., established industrial units in Butibori and Takhalghat in Nagpur pursuant to the “Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993” announced by the Governm...