Globus Real Infra Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals-II (Delhi High Court, 2023) – GST Refund on Lease Transactions & Impact of IBC Resolution Plan

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner entered into a lease agreement dated 01.04.2015 with Bhushan Steel Limited (now Tata Steel BSL Ltd.) for leasing immovable property. CIRP proceedings were ini...

M/s Balaji Exim vs Commissioner, CGST & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of ITC Cannot Be Denied on Mere Suspicion of Fake Invoices under Section 16 CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Balaji Exim, filed refund applications seeking refund of unutilized ITC on exports, including IGST and Cess. The refund claims were rejected by the department on the ground that the...

M/s Balaji Exim vs Commissioner, CGST & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of ITC Cannot Be Denied on Mere Suspicion of Fake Invoices

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Balaji Exim, filed refund applications dated 11.09.2020 and 12.09.2020 seeking refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to ₹72,03,961 and ₹12,40,270 respectively, ...

DL Support Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner CGST Appeals II Delhi & Anr. (2023) – Appellate Authority Cannot Introduce New Grounds Beyond Show Cause Notice | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, DL Support Services India Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 19.04.2022 denying refund of Integrated GST paid on export of services for April 20...

M/s Ernst and Young Limited vs Additional Commissioner CGST Appeals-II Delhi & Anr – Intermediary Services vs Export of Services under IGST Act (Delhi High Court 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, an Indian branch office of Ernst & Young Limited (UK), provided professional consultancy and advisory services to overseas group entities such as EY US, EY Australia, EY UK, and EY ...

Ohmi Industries Asia Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of IGST on Export of Services Not Governed by Rule 89(4) of CGST Rules

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Ohmi Industries Asia Private Limited, filed a refund application dated 29.05.2020 seeking refund of ₹3,99,187/- towards Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid on export of serv...

M/s Ohmi Industries Asia Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of IGST on Market Research Services Not Intermediary Service

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Ohmi Industries Asia Private Limited, is an Indian company providing services to its foreign affiliate, OHMI Industries Ltd., Japan. The petitioner entered into two agreements for: ...

GAIL (India) Limited vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr. (2023) – Garnishee Proceedings Cannot Enforce Disputed GST Liability

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, GAIL (India) Limited, is a Central Public Sector Undertaking engaged in transportation of petroleum and natural gas. GAIL awarded a contract to Respondent No.2 for...

Nanu Ram Goyal vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Delhi & Ors. – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication of Show Cause Notice Held Impermissible under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, a civil construction contractor, executed a housing project for Haryana Housing Board. Investigation was initiated for alleged non-payment of service tax under “...

Titan Umreifungstechnik GmbH and Co. KG vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Patent Refusal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning under Sections 2(1)(ja) & 10(4) of the Patents Act

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant filed Patent Application No. 7529/DELNP/2014 as a national phase application derived from a PCT application for an invention titled “Plastics Material Strapping Band and Method for Prod...