No Addition under Section 153A in Absence of Incriminating Material for Unabated Year; Revenue Appeal Dismissed Following Abhisar Buildwell – PCIT-1 vs. Mirage Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 426
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 16.05.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 2624/DEL/2016 relating to Assessment Y...

GST Adjudication Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Reply and Denial of Cross-Examination in Fraud Proceedings under Section 74 – Ambika Traders vs. Additional Commissioner DGGSTI (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 639
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ambika Traders, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Gaurav Gupta engaged in the business of metal scrap, was registered under GST after migration from the VAT regime. A search was conducted b...

Reopening Quashed for Change of Opinion; Survey-Based Comparison with Subsequent Year Data Invalid – Matrix Clothing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 369
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Matrix Clothing Private Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging notices dated 31.03.2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16 an...

Excess Cash Deposits Held Unexplained; No Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A – Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Ward 14(3) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 353
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had ...

Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional AO and Faceless AO Reaffirmed; Reassessment Notices Upheld Despite Section 151A Challenge – Inder Dev Gupta vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 419
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by Inder Dev Gupta and connected petitioners challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer of Central Ci...

Writ Petition challenging the retention of seized assets and seeking release of jewellery, cash and bullion seized during search proceedings KOSHALIYA DEVI RASTOGI Versus ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, NEW DELHI AND ANR

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 483
Read More »
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision : 06.01.2026W.P.(C) 7448/2025 CM APPL. 41160/2025 KOSHALIYA DEVI RASTOGI ............................................PetitionerThrough: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv....

Reassessment Quashed as Time-Barred Where Notice Dispatched After Limitation Despite ITBA Generation Before Cut-Off – Grid Solutions SAS vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 481
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Grid Solutions SAS, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 30.03.2025 issued under Section 148A(1) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2019–20, the order dated 30.06...

Receipts from Off-the-Shelf Software, Bandwidth and IT Support Services Not Taxable as Royalty or FTS under India–Singapore DTAA; Revenue Appeals Dismissed – CIT (International Taxation) vs. DXC Technology Services Singapore (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 348
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Quashed as Time-Barred; TOLA Inapplicable Post Rajeev Bansal – Anju Khosla vs. ITO Ward 15(1) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 377
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anju Khosla, challenged a notice dated 26.08.2024 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2015–16, the order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A(...

Reassessment Upheld Where No Change of Reasons and Section 148A Procedure Properly Followed Post-2022 Amendment – Amandeep Singh (Guru Kripa Enterprises) vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 370
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Amandeep Singh, proprietor of Guru Kripa Enterprises, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021–22 on 14.03.2022 declaring income of ₹8,53,950. On 29.03.2025, the Revenue ...