Supreme Court Allows Non-Compete Fee as Revenue Expenditure u/s 37(1); Reverses High Court View, Matters Remanded to ITAT | SC Ruling (19 Dec 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 437
Read More »
Non-compete fee allowable revenue expense under section 37(1); Reverses High Court ratio December 19, 2025Supreme Court reverses High Court judgment, holds that non-compete fee payment is allowable revenue expense under...

Bombay High Court Admits Revenue’s Appeal on Jurisdictional Bar u/s 124(3) & Additional Grounds: ITAT’s Quashing of 143(3) r.w.s. 144C Proceedings Put to Test | PCIT, Pune v. Fiat India Automobiles (P) Ltd. (Bom HC, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 381
Read More »
High Court : Admits Revenue’s appeal on substantial questions of law involving jurisdictional issue Bombay High Court admits Revenue’s appeal on jurisdictional issue in case of Fiat India Automobiles (P) Ltd; High C...

Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied When Form 67 & Revised Return Filed Within Time – Delhi ITAT in DCIT v. Malvinder Mohan Singh [TS-1637-ITAT-2025 (Del.)]

Author
My Tax Expert
19/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 344
Read More »
The case of the Assessee was selected for Limited Scrutiny on the issue that Double Taxation Relief was claimed under sections 90/91 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Assessee was holding foreign assets.During the cour...

Revenue Challenges GAAR Panel Order in Vedanta Case; Delhi High Court Stays Order, Lists Writ for Feb 2026 — Vedanta Holdings Mauritius II Ltd. v. CIT (Intl. Taxation)–3, Delhi

Author
My Tax Expert
17/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 743
Read More »
Revenue files counter writ in Vedanta GAAR case; High Court hearing in February 2026.The Revenue has filed a counter writ petition challenging the order passed by the GAAR Panel in the case concerning Vedanta Holdings Ma...

Clerical Error in Claiming Wrong Exemption Section Cannot Deny Benefit to Educational Trust: ITAT Agra in Om Charitable Chikitsa Samiti v. AO (Exemption)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 542
Read More »
Assessee, an educational institution, was registered under section 12AA and was also granted exemption under section 10(23C)(vi). During the year, due to a clerical omission, deduction was claimed under section 10(23C)(i...

Bombay High Court Grants Full Stay of Demand Where Revenue Taxed Gross Receipts of Educational Trust Without Considering Expenditure, Godavari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Sindhi v. CIT (Exemption), Pune and Others

Author
My Tax Expert
17/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 440
Read More »
Revenue erred in taxing gross receipts of Trust without considering expenditure; grants full stay of demand.The Writ Petition was filed challenging the order dated 11.07.2025 passed by Respondent No. 1. By the impugned o...

Subsequent Supreme Court Ruling Not a Ground for ITAT Rectification under Section 254(2): Bombay High Court, Sila Solutions (P) Ltd. v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
17/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 424
Read More »
Subsequent Superior Court ruling no ground for ITAT to invoke Section 254(2); no mistake apparent in ITAT’s original order.In the present case, initially, the Assessing Officer made a disallowance of Rs. 2,25,94,571/- ...

Delhi High Court Upholds Prosecution in ₹348 Crore Tax Evasion Case; Rejects Constitutional Challenge to CBDT Circulars on Prosecution

Author
My Tax Expert
16/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 526
Read More »
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has upheld the initiation of prosecution under the Income-tax Act in a case involving alleged tax evasion amounting to ₹348 crores, while categorically rejecting the consti...

Assessing Officer’s Duty to Examine All Issues in Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Upholds Section 263 Revision Order

Author
My Tax Expert
16/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 501
Read More »
Emphasizes Assessing Officer’s duty to scrutinize all issues noticed during reassessment proceedings; Upholds revision order Delhi ITAT upholds the revision order under Section 263 holding the reassessment order as er...

Dumb Documents” Have No Evidentiary Value: Chennai ITAT Deletes ₹25.78 Crore Addition under Section 69B r.w.s. 115BBE of Income tax Act, DCIT v. Jaya Pradeep [TS-1630-ITAT-2025(CHNY)]

Author
My Tax Expert
16/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 578
Read More »
“Dumb documents” have no evidentiary value, incapable of supporting addition; Deletes Section 69B addition Chennai ITAT dismisses Revenue’s appeal confirming CIT(A)’s order deleting the addition of Rs. 25,78,98,...