Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) vs. Assessee (Name Not Available) – Delhi High Court Holds Revenue Appeal Not Maintainable Without Committee on Disputes (COD) Approval | ITR No. 72/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an Income Tax Reference before the Delhi High Court. During the proceedings, it was observed that approval from the Committee on Disputes (COD) had not been obtained. ...

Moser Baer India Ltd. vs. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. Delhi High Court Landmark Judgment on Section 92CA(3): Arm's Length Price (ALP) Adjustments by Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) Declared Void in the Absence of Mandatory Oral Hearing and Confrontation of Comparative Data Under the Principles of Natural Justice

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by several major corporate entities—including Moser Baer India Ltd., HCL Technologies BPO Services Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd., Haier Appliances (I) ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. – Revival of Revenue Appeals Dismissed Due to Prior Committee on Disputes (COD) Rejection

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue had filed appeals against Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. for Assessment Years 2001-02 and 2002-03. Earlier, these appeals were disposed of on 6 May 2009 because the required appro...

Moser Baer India Ltd. & Others vs. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Another: Mandatoriness of Oral Hearing and Fair Disclosure of Material in Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Price (ALP) Determinations under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of six writ petitions was filed before the Delhi High Court by several prominent corporate assessees—including Moser Baer India Ltd., HCL Technologies BPO Services Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central) II vs. Usha Marketing (Pvt.) Ltd. — Disallowance of Share Transaction Loss as Group Strategy Book Loss vs. Levy of Penalty for Concealment under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961: High Court Affirms Mere Rejection of Business Loss Claim Does Not Attract Concealment Penalty When Genuine Transaction Particulars Are Disclosed

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee company deals in the sale and transfer of shares. During the Assessment Year 1986-87, the Assessing Officer (AO) permitted the company to convert certain s...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Rural Electrification Corp. Ltd. | Maintainability of Income Tax Appeal and Revival Post-Abolition of Committee on Disputes (COD) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
 Facts of the Case·         The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) preferred two appeals, numbered ITA 84/2008 (pertaining to Assessment Year 2001-02) and ITA 85/2008 (...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. (and Connected Appeals): Allowability of Depreciation on a Temporarily Closed Business Unit Forming Part of a Unified 'Block of Assets' Under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Profile & Claims: The assessee, a well-established company, claimed statutory depreciation amounting to ₹9.31 Crores on its various capital assets for the Assessment Y...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gupta Abhushan Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court Rules That Stock Discrepancies and Renovation Work Found During Section 133A Survey Cannot Form 'Reason to Believe' for Reopening Past Assessments Under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee filed income tax returns for the Assessment Years (AY) 1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-2002, which were originally processed under Section 143(1) of the Income...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee – Rule of Consistency Applied; Revenue Appeals Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arose | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in respect of Assessment Years 1996-97 and 1997-98.During the hearing, couns...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. (and Associated Appeals): Whether Depreciation Under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is Allowable on a Temporarily Closed or Non-Functional Unit Solely Because It Forms Part of a Consolidated 'Block of Assets'

Author
My Tax Expert
15/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
1. Facts of the Case The Parties: The appeals involve the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) as the Appellant and M/s. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. along with M/s. Oswal Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. as...