Facts
of the CaseThe Revenue (Appellant) filed appeals
(ITA Nos. 57/2009 and 341/2009) before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court against the
orders passed in favor of the assessee, M/s Jagson International Ltd
(Responden...
Facts of the Case
Parties
& Group Appeals: This case involves a batch
of appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against
various international air carriers including Singapore Ai...
Facts of the
CaseThe present case involved the validity of
reassessment notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Sections 147
and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and
1...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred a batch of appeals against various international and
domestic airlines operating in India.
A
survey under Section 133A revealed that the assessee-airlines su...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred a batch of appeals directed against several national and
international airlines operating from India (with the lead case being CIT
vs. Singapore Airlines Ltd. f...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of appeals before
the High Court of Delhi involving 12 different international air carriers
(including Singapore Airlines, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, British Airways, Air
...
Facts
of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income
Tax-II) preferred two statutory tax appeals, designated as ITA No. 57/2009 and
ITA No. 341/2009, before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi under the provisions
of t...
Facts of the
Case
Reassessment proceedings were initiated under the provisions of the
Income-tax Act.
Prior sanction as contemplated under Section 151(1)(ii) was
required before issuance of the reassessm...
Facts
of the CaseThe assessee entered into a specific
business agreement with M/s. Mas Services Private Limited. Under the terms of
this agreement, M/s. Mas Services Private Limited permitted the assessee to
utilize ...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The
Tribunal had directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under Section...