Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Raghav Behl | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Leviable on Bona Fide Claim Where Two Views Are Possible – Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO), during proceedings under Section
147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, examined the assessee's return for Assessment
Year 2002-03. The assessee had claimed expenditure amounting ...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs Mukesh Luthra – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material; Section 80HHC Export Deduction Upheld | Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue initiated reassessment proceedings
against the assessee, Mukesh Luthra, by issuing notices under Section 148 of
the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. NIIT Ltd. | Section 194-I TDS on Infrastructure Claims Paid to Franchisees – Franchise Revenue Sharing Not Rent
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, NIIT Ltd., was engaged in the business of
providing computer education and training through its own centres as well as
through franchisees operating under NIIT’s licence and brand name....
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. – Business Advances for Commercial Purpose Not Taxable as Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseM/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. was engaged in
the business of dyeing and printing cloth and functioned as an ancillary unit
for M/s Pee Empro Exports Pvt. Ltd. for several years.Both comp...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs. Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material – Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment
proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years
1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 on the ground that income had escaped
a...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessees (ITA Nos. 870–879 of 2009) | Delhi High Court | Scope of Rectification under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
The ITAT dismissed the appeals filed by the assessees.
The assessees challenged the Tribunal’s orders by filing appeals
before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act....
Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Section 115JB MAT – Withdrawal from Revaluation Reserve Not Deductible Unless Added Back in Year of Creation
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., engaged in
the business of manufacturing yarn and polyester products, computed its book
profit for Assessment Year 2001-02 under Section 115JB after red...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Adidas India Trading Pvt. Ltd. – Advertisement Expenditure on Licensed Brand Held Allowable as Business Deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Adidas India Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed its return
of income for Assessment Year 1997-98 declaring a loss. During assessment
proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material – Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue initiated reassessment proceedings
against the assessee for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 by
issuing notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the allegati...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Batch of Appeals) – Scope of Rectification under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act When ITAT Orders Are Already Under Challenge Before High Court
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had filed appeals before the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which were dismissed by the Tribunal. Aggrieved
by the orders of the ITAT, the assessees preferred appeals before the De...