Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Jyoti Limboo (Prop. M/s Jyoti & Co.) | Delhi High Court | Validity of Search Warrant Issued by Additional Director under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeals arose from block assessment proceedings relating to the period from 1 April 1989 to 23 June 1999. The assessee challenged the validity of the search and subsequent assessmen...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Publishing Respondent Company (Delhi High Court) – Long Term Capital Loss on Solitary Sale of Shares Held as Investment Cannot Be Treated as Speculative Loss Under Section 73 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The Respondent-Assessee is a corporate entity whose admitted core business activity is solely that of publishing. During the assessment year under consideration, the Assessee file...

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs SMC Credit Limited [2010] 2010:DHC:27-DB (Delhi High Court) under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 1998-99 and concerned a loss of ₹18,06,620 claimed by the assessee, SMC Credit Limited, as a trading/business loss arising from transactions in shares.The Ass...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Mideast India Ltd.: Delhi High Court Ruling on Non-Taxability of Foreign Branch Business Profits Earned through Permanent Establishment (PE) in USSR under Article 7 of Indo-USSR DTAA Read with Section 90 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee is an Indian corporate entity that maintained a functional Permanent Establishment (PE) branch inside the USSR during the assessment period related to the yea...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Jyoti Limboo (Prop. M/s Jyoti & Co.) | Retrospective Amendment under Section 132(1) Validates Search Warrant Issued by Additional Director of Income Tax | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the Case1.      The assessee was subjected to search and seizure proceedings pursuant to a warrant of authorization issued by the Additional Director of Income Tax (Investigation).2...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs National Fertilizers Ltd. | Delhi High Court Holds Revenue Appeal Not Maintainable Without Committee on Disputes (COD) Approval

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had dismissed the Revenue’s appeal because th...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ashwani Gupta [Delhi High Court] – Assessment Held Invalid Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice | Non-Supply of Seized Material & Denial of Cross-Examination Fatal to Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal against the order dated 08.02.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning the block assessment period from 01.04.1990 to 20.08.2000. The Comm...

A Comprehensive Jurisprudential Study of Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act: Analyzing the Delhi High Court’s Landmark Ruling in CIT v. [Assessee] (ITA No. 1303/2009) on the Crucial Test of Capital Asset Creation vs. Ongoing Business Operations

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe revenue department (appellant) filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute centered around certain expenses incurred by the assessee during its ongoin...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II) vs. P.C. Jain (HUF) | Delhi High Court Remands Matter After Retrospective Amendment Empowering Additional Director to Issue Search Warrants under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee challenged the validity of assessment proceedings initiated pursuant to a search conducted under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act. It was contended that the warrant of aut...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II) vs. P.C. Jain (HUF) | Retrospective Amendment Validates Search Warrant Issued by Additional Director under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeals arose from a common order dated 22 April 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Year 2001-02. The assessee challenged the validity of the assessmen...