Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Agra Beverages Corporation P. Ltd.Franchisee Business Expenditures and Commercial Expediency under Section 37(1)
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee was a franchisee of M/s. Pepsi Food (Pvt.) Ltd.
(Pepsi). Under this Franchisee Agreement, the assessee held exclusive
rights for bottling, selling, and distri...
Smt. Kalawanti Garg vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Cash Gifts from Minor Sons and Unverifiable Cash Loans Added as Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Background: The appellant/assessee is an individual
engaged in the business of civil contract. For the Assessment Year (AY)
2006-07, she filed her income tax return declarin...
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Agra Beverages Corporation P. Ltd. (Allowability of Business Expenditure under Section 37(1) on Visi-Cooler Hire Charges and Advertisement Expenses Incurred by Franchisee Benefiting the Trademark Owner)
Facts of the Case
Franchisee
Agreement: The respondent-assessee entered into a
franchisee agreement with M/s. Pepsi Food (Pvt.) Ltd. ("Pepsi")
for manufacturing, bottling, selling, and distributing Pe...
CIT vs. Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt. Ltd. | Sale of Shares to Group Company Before Amalgamation to Mitigate Liability is Not a Colourable Device for Tax Avoidance Under Section 45 & 48
Facts of the Case
The
respondent/assessee, Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt. Ltd. (GDOPL),
was engaged in the business of leasing equipment and filed a return
declaring a loss of ₹4,71,54,2...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Intex Technology India Ltd. & Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Narender Bansal | Block Assessment Under Section 158BC and Share Application Money Cash Credits Under Section 68 Disallowed Upon Genuineness Verification
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred two connected appeals before
the High Court of Delhi challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the block assessment period fro...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. [Assessee Name] | Deductions Under Section 36(1)(ii) for Commission and Bonus Paid to Managing Director Allowed
Facts of the Case
The
case involves two income tax appeals (ITA Nos. 73/2010 & 1717/2010)
pertaining to the assessment years 2004–2005 and 2005–2006.
In
its returns, the respondent-assessee...
Commissioner of Income Tax, IV vs. M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (and M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.) – Section 263 Revisional Powers Cannot Be Invoked Merely Due to a Difference of Opinion
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) passed assessment orders for two
assessment years concerning the assessees (M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing
Co. Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.)...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.: Scope of Revisionary Power under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe dispute arose from assessment orders passed by the
Assessing Officer (AO) regarding two separate assessment years for the sister
concerns, M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Intex Technology India Ltd. & Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Narender Bansal | Deletion of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 and Block Assessment Under Section 158BC Upheld Based on Verified Identity and Creditworthiness of Share Applicants
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred two connected appeals before
the High Court of Delhi arising out of a common order passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 21.11.2008. The dispute related to the blo...
Saamag Construction Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Delhi High Court Ruling on Special Audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe matter involves a batch of writ petitions, including W.P.(C)
2250/2011 (Saamag Construction Ltd.), filed before the High Court of Delhi.
The petitioners sought to challenge the legality and the ini...