Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Raj Kumar Mangla vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2010] 2010:DHC:2544-DB (Delhi High Court) Rectification Application Under Section 154 Cannot Be Rejected Without Personal Hearing – Delhi High Court Sets Aside CIT(A) Order and Directs Fresh Adjudication

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseRaj Kumar Mangla filed writ proceedings challenging certain actions taken by the Income Tax Department.The petitioner raised two principal grievances before the Delhi High Court.Issue Relating to...

Raj Kumar Mangla vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2010] 2010:DHC:2543-DB (Delhi High Court) Opportunity of Hearing Mandatory Before Disposal of Rectification Application Under Section 154 – Delhi High Court Directs Fresh Hearing by CIT(A) | Sections 154 & 127(2) Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raj Kumar Mangla, appeared before the Delhi High Court in person and challenged certain actions taken by the Income Tax Department.The petitioner raised two principal grievances.F...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Baldev Raj Charla [2010] 2010:DHC:2571-DB (Delhi High Court) Capital Gains on Sale of Company Property Assessable Only in Hands of Company and Not Director – Section 49(1) Not Applicable to Family Arrangement Involving Corporate Assets | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseAmbitious Gold Nibs Company Private Limited acquired an industrial property measuring approximately 2829 square yards situated at C-101, Maya Puri Industrial Area, Delhi, from the Delhi Develop...

St. Lawrence Educational Society (Regd.) & Another v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central) & Another | The Baptist Educational Society & Anr. v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax [Delhi High Court]

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner societies were registered educational societies engaged in running schools. Applications in Form No. 56D were submitted seeking approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Jyoti Charla [2010] 2010:DHC:2569-DB (Delhi High Court) I Capital Gains on Sale of Company-Owned Property Taxable Only in Hands of Company and Not Directors – Section 49(1) Inapplicable to Family Arrangement | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseAmbitious Gold Nibs Company Private Limited acquired an industrial property measuring approximately 2829 square yards situated at C-101, Maya Puri Industrial Area, Delhi, from the Delhi Developme...

Galileo International Inc. vs Director of Income Tax | Delhi High Court Clarifies Taxability of Permanent Establishment (PE) Income and Deduction of Expenses

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed appeals relating to different assessment years. The primary controversy was whether the assessee had a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The lower authorities, after...

Ericsson AB vs Additional Director of Income Tax, Range-1, International Taxation, New Delhi [Delhi High Court] – Assessee Must First Exhaust Remedy Before Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) Under Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case• Ericsson AB challenged a draft assessment order passed under Section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2007-08.• The petitioner contended that the Assessing Officer had fa...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. [2010] 2010:DHC:2568-DB (Delhi High Court) I Foreign Travel Expenditure of Employees Incurred for Commercial Expediency and Provision for Warranty Held Allowable Deduction – Sections 37(1) & Warranty Provision Principles | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNokia India Pvt. Ltd. claimed deduction of foreign travel expenses incurred on its employees, particularly field engineers who were deputed abroad for business assignments.During assessment proceedings...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. J. K. Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court on Section 37(1), ITA 1327/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The petitioner, Commissioner of Income Tax, challenged the income tax assessment order passed in favor of J. K. Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., whereby certain expenses claimed by the assessee were...

Director of Income Tax v. Galileo International Inc. – Delhi High Court Reaffirms Taxability Principles; Revenue Appeals Dismissed Following Binding Precedent

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the order passed in favour of the assessee. The principal issue involved in the appeals had already been adjudicated by t...