Facts of the CaseRaj Kumar Mangla filed writ proceedings
challenging certain actions taken by the Income Tax Department.The petitioner raised two principal grievances
before the Delhi High Court.Issue Relating to...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raj Kumar Mangla, appeared before
the Delhi High Court in person and challenged certain actions taken by the
Income Tax Department.The petitioner raised two principal grievances.F...
Facts
of the CaseAmbitious
Gold Nibs Company Private Limited acquired an industrial property measuring
approximately 2829 square yards situated at C-101, Maya Puri Industrial Area,
Delhi, from the Delhi Develop...
Facts of the
Case
The petitioner societies were registered educational societies
engaged in running schools.
Applications in Form No. 56D were submitted seeking approval under
Section 10(23C)(vi) of the ...
Facts of the CaseAmbitious Gold Nibs Company Private Limited
acquired an industrial property measuring approximately 2829 square yards
situated at C-101, Maya Puri Industrial Area, Delhi, from the Delhi Developme...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee filed appeals relating to different assessment years.
The primary controversy was whether the assessee had a Permanent
Establishment (PE) in India.
The lower authorities, after...
Facts
of the Case• Ericsson AB challenged a draft
assessment order passed under Section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for
Assessment Year 2007-08.• The petitioner contended that
the Assessing Officer had fa...
Facts of the CaseNokia India Pvt. Ltd. claimed deduction of foreign
travel expenses incurred on its employees, particularly field engineers who
were deputed abroad for business assignments.During assessment proceedings...
Facts of the Case:The petitioner, Commissioner of Income Tax,
challenged the income tax assessment order passed in favor of J. K.
Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., whereby certain expenses claimed by the
assessee were...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the
Delhi High Court challenging the order passed in favour of the assessee. The
principal issue involved in the appeals had already been adjudicated by t...