Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

AREVA T&D SA Vs The Asst. Director of Income Tax & Ors. – Delhi High Court – Section 147, 195, 197 – Tax Deduction & Permanent Establishment Issue

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the Case AREVA T&D SA, a French company, was awarded multiple turnkey contracts by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (PGCIL) between 1998 and 2002 for offshore supply, onshore supply, and o...

Shailendra vs Union of India & Ors – Delhi High Court Case on Service Law & Promotion under Central Civil Services Rules, Sections 14, 15, 16

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The petitioner, Shailendra, challenged the promotion and seniority list issued by the Union of India & Ors in respect of cadre positions under the Central Civil Services Rules. He contended that...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Tulip Star Hotels Ltd.: Analysis under Sections 36(1)(vii) & 35D of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The assessee, Tulip Star Hotels Ltd., a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), placed fixed deposits with Citibank and extended guarantees for loans to Fairmark, a company co-promote...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vipin Gupta – Disallowance of Income and Verification of Claimed Expenditure under Section 148, Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Vipin Gupta received a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 1995-96 based on documents seized from Fena Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO...

Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Despite Prior Orders under Sections 195(2) and 197 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – AREVA T&D SA v. Assistant Director of Income Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Union of India, challenged the respondent Sanjay Kumar’s claim for a promotion under the applicable service rules. The respondent had alleged non-compliance with prescribed promotion ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XI, New Delhi vs. Shri Sunil Chopra (2011) – Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act – Business Advances, Share Application Money and Colourable Transactions

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Sunil Chopra, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2005-06 declaring income from property brokerage business and other sources. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Appeals – Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e) Taxable Only in Hands of Shareholder | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the Case Various closely held companies advanced loans or provided financial accommodations to concerns in which common shareholders had substantial interest. In the lead case, Jackson Generators...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Taxability of Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e) in the Hands of Non-Shareholder Concern

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company received advances/loans from another closely held company. Certain individuals held substantial shareholding in both the lending company and the recipient concern. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. | Landmark Delhi High Court Ruling on Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals involved a common question regarding the interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dealing with deemed dividend. The lead matter concerned Ankitech Pv...

Commissioner of Income Tax XVI vs Sh. Fumio Goto & Connected Matters – Applicability of Section 10(10CC), Section 17(2), and Section 40 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The batch of appeals involved multiple foreign nationals deputed to work in India for Indian subsidiaries of their foreign employers. The core issues concerned the tax treatment of: Employer-paid ...