Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Sh. Dinesh Kumar Goel v. Commissioner of Income Tax – Allowability of Genuine Business Expenditure Claimed Through Revised Return Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Bills Were Not Ledgerized | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his original return for Assessment Year 1997-98 declaring taxable income and claiming deduction of advertisement expenditure.Subsequently, a search under Section 132(1) of the Inco...

Director of Income Tax vs. M/s. Jacabs Civil Incorporated (and M/s. Mitsubishi Corporation): Section 234B Interest Deleted for Non-Resident Assessees as Tax is Fully Deductible at Source; Section 234D Interest Prohibited Retrospectively

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of tax appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a series of concurrent orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted i...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ram Kishan Dass & Connected Matters – Limitation for Completion of Assessment under Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Following CIT v. Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan Agro Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed multiple appeals against the orders passed in favour of the assessees, namely Ram Kishan Dass and Sunder Exports. The principal issue involved the validity and li...

CIT v. Assessee (ITA No. 541/2010) – Delhi High Court | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied on Bona Fide Claims Relating to Royalty, Sales Tax Interest and Additional Sales Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings after making additions/disallowances on the following grounds:1. Royalty Payment DisallowanceThe assessee had claimed deduction of royalty expendit...

M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | AY 1982-83 | Section 40(c), Section 41(1) & Business Expenditure Disallowance

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present reference before the Delhi High Court arose from Assessment Year 1982-83 involving M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. and the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. & Others (Delhi High Court) – Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e) Taxable Only in Hands of Shareholder and Not Concern Receiving Loan

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees in the batch of appeals had received loans, advances, or book-entry credits from closely held companies. The common feature in all cases was that certain individuals who held substantial ...

M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Disallowance under Section 40C and Related Income Tax Deductions

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd., claimed various deductions and expenditures in its return for the Assessment Year 1982-83.The disputes pertained to: Disallowance of Rs. 3,65,000/- under ...

Commissioner of Income Tax & Another vs. M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. & Another | Delhi High Court on Sections 41(1), 35(2)(ia), 35(1)(iv) & 37(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 1982-83. The Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on four substantial questions of law involving: Taxability of liab...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan Agro Pvt. Ltd., ITA Nos. 1775/2010, 1776/2010, 1777/2010, 1965/2010, 2032/2010 to 2039/2010, 2046/2010 & 2047/2010 (Delhi High Court, decided on 27.05.2011)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan Agro Pvt. Ltd., filed returns for various assessment years. A search and seizure operation under the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 7 October 2004 an...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tulip Star Hotels Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Bad Debt Deduction under Sections 36(1)(vii), 36(2) and Applicability of Section 35D of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAssessment Year 1998-99The assessee, an NBFC engaged in financing and leasing activities, had placed a fixed deposit of ₹100 lakhs with Citibank during the financial year 1994-95. The deposit was p...