Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Long-Term Finance Deductions
Facts of the
Case:The National Cooperative Development Corporation
(NCDC), established under the National Cooperative Development Corporation
Act, 1962, filed multiple appeals challenging the decisions of the Income T...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Doon Valley Rice Ltd | Section 271(1)(c) & Section 37 – Foreign Travel Expenses and Penalty Dispute
Facts of the
CaseThe respondent, Doon Valley Rice Ltd, filed
its income tax return for the Assessment Year 2003-04 declaring a loss of
₹9,81,50,987 on 27.11.2003. The Assessing Officer (AO) computed a loss
of ₹9,...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd – Assessment of Interest Income under Section 80HHC(4A), Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had remitted the computation of
interest on inter-corporate deposits, securities, and bank deposits to the
Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Th...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd – Assessment of Interest Income under Section 80HHC(4A), Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had remitted the computation of
interest on inter-corporate deposits, securities, and bank deposits to the
Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Th...
Comprehensive Judicial Analysis: Pitney Bowes India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax – Determining the Taxability and Classification of Non-Compete Fees under the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Pitney Bowes India Pvt. Ltd., was incorporated
on April 23, 2004, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pitney Bowes Inc., USA, to
establish a direct presence in the Indian market. As part of ...
Comprehensive Analysis of Legal Precedents Regarding Mandatory Interest Under Section 234C: A Case Study of Bill & Peggy Marketing India Pvt Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, a company involved in marketing, was subject to
assessment for the financial year 2004-05. During this period, the company made
several payments toward advance tax to fulfill its obligat...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. East India Syntex Limited: A Comprehensive Judicial Analysis on the Scope of Block Assessment Proceedings and the Classification of Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, East India Syntex Limited, is engaged in the
manufacturing and production of polyester viscose blended yarn and 100%
polyester yarn. For the block assessment period of 1.4.1988 to 14.10.1...
BLB Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Analysis of Reassessment Proceedings and the "Change of Opinion" Doctrine
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, BLB Limited, filed its income tax return for
the Assessment Year (AY) 2003-04, declaring an income under Section 115JB of
the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the original scrutiny asse...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce: Detailed Analysis of Rule 8D and Section 14A
Facts of the CaseThe case consolidated three separate income tax appeals (ITA
277/2009, 460/2009, and 949/2009) concerning the assessment years 2004-05,
2000-01, and 2002-03. The dispute involved the Oriental Bank of C...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce: Detailed Analysis of the Non-Retrospective Nature of Rule 8D and the Application of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe appeals pertained to the assessment years 2000-01,
2002-03, and 2004-05 concerning the respondent, Oriental Bank of Commerce. The
dispute arose regarding the application of Rule 8D of the Income Ta...