Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. (Sweden), is a
non-resident tax entity that entered into supply, installation, and overall
contracts with multiple Indian cellular operators to execute tu...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. (Sweden), is a
non-resident tax entity that entered into supply, installation, and overall
contracts with multiple Indian cellular operators to execute tu...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee was a limited company engaged in manufacturing rice
from paddy and selling rice in the local market.
During
the assessment proceedings for the Assessment Y...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of appeals before the Delhi High
Court against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which
had deleted substantial additions made by Assessing Officers...
Facts of the Case
The
Assessee Profile: M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B.
(referred to as Ericsson A.B. or ERA) is a company incorporated in Sweden
and a tax resident of Sweden. It is a 100% subsidiary...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI) filed a batch of
four cross-appeals—namely ITA No. 459/2008, ITA No. 337/2007, ITA No. 338/2007,
and ITA No. 131/2009—before the High Court of Delhi. Th...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal against the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT) order regarding the assessment year 2006-2007. The assessee,
M/s Visual Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., had claimed a deductio...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Rio Tinto Technical Services (a foreign
company), operated in India through a division. During the Assessment Years
1999-2000 to 2001-02, it received payments from Rio Tinto India Private...
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, a foreign company (Rio Tinto Technical
Services), operated in India through a division. During the relevant assessment
years (1999-2000 to 2001-02), the assessee received payments from ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Girnar Investment Ltd., a public limited
company, was assessed for the 1995-96 assessment year, resulting in a tax
demand of Rs. 21,44,521. The petitioner filed an appeal before the CIT...