Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Interpretation of Section 13(1)(c) and Treatment of Project Grants: Director of Income Tax v. Society for Development Alternatives
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, the Society for Development Alternatives, is an
institution registered under Section 12A and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act,
1961. The organization is dedicated to rural development, f...
The Synodical Board of Health Services vs. Director General of Income Tax: Scope of Scrutiny for Section 10(23C)(iv) Registration
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, The Synodical Board of Health Services, a
society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, engaged in
managing hospitals and community health programs, applied for registr...
Kanchenjunga Advertising Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT-I – Whether Wrong Claim of Bad Debt on Share Application Money Attracts Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kanchenjunga Advertising Pvt. Ltd., filed its
return of income for Assessment Year 2000-01 declaring taxable income. During
scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed ...
Penalty for Concealment: Assessing Inaccurate Particulars vs. Legal Contentions – Kanchenjunga Advertising P. Ltd. vs. CIT (U/S 271(1)(c))
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Kanchenjunga Advertising P. Ltd., a domestic
company, filed its return for the assessment year 2000-01. During scrutiny, the
Assessing Officer (AO) identified a claim of Rs. 2,38,32,392/...
Analyzing Section 13(1)(c) Compliance and the Tax Treatment of Tied Project Grants: A Comprehensive Review of Director of Income Tax vs. Society for Development Alternatives
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, a society registered under Section 12A and 80G
of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is engaged in research and development for rural
welfare and environmental regeneration. The Revenue (Appella...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Software Consultants: Assessing Jurisdiction under Section 263 and the Scope of Section 147
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a private company, failed to file an income tax
return for the Assessment Year (AY) 1993-94. A subsequent search conducted by
the Central Bureau of Investigation at the premises of a dire...
Rajat Export Import India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer: Validity of Reopening Assessment Based on Accommodation Entry Reports
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a private limited company, filed its return
for the assessment year 2004-05, which was processed under Section 143(1) of
the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the Income Tax Officer (Respon...
T & T Motors Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Judicial Interpretation of 'Sales Promotion' vs. 'Selling Expenses' under Section 115WB(2)(D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, T & T Motors Ltd., is an automobile dealer.
During the assessment year 2006-07, the company provided various car
accessories to customers "free of cost" (FOC) at the time of car
boo...
Alpine Electronics Asia Pte Ltd. vs. Director General of Income Tax: Mandatory Compliance with Section 143(2) Notice in Reassessment Proceedings
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a Singapore-based company, operated a liaison
office in India. Upon deciding to close this office in 2008, the petitioner
applied for a "no objection certificate" (NOC) from the Income ...
Distinguishing Trade Discounts from Commission Payments: An In-Depth Analysis of Section 194H in the Case of CIT vs. Mother Dairy India Ltd.
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue initiated a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act at the
business premises of the respondent, Mother Dairy India Ltd.
The
respondent operated a distribution ...