Facts of the CaseFor Assessment Year 2003-04, the petitioner filed
its return declaring nil income along with audited financial statements, Form
29B, computation of income, and schedules to accounts. The accounts
spec...
Facts of the CaseThe case arises from an appeal filed by the Revenue
(Commissioner of Income Tax) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the respondent-assessee, Sauer Danfoss Pvt Ltd, for the Assessme...
Facts of the CaseThe respondent assessee, Fortis Financial Services
Ltd., engaged in financial services business, filed returns for Assessment
Years 1996–97 and 1997–98.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing
...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee company, Nova Promoters & Finlease
(P) Ltd., filed its return declaring a loss for Assessment Year 2000-01. The
original return was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the A...
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Profile & Return: The respondent-assessee, a corporate
entity, filed its return of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03 on
October 30, 2002, declaring a total income ...
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking
to quash an order dated June 8, 2007, passed by the Chief Commissioner of
Income Tax (Central).
The
...
Facts of the CaseM/s Shanker Trading (P) Ltd., engaged in the
business of manufacturing Katha and Cutch, had taken on lease a factory
belonging to Mehta Charitable Prajnalaya Trust with effect from 01.06.1978.
Initial...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner company, M/s. I.M. Constructions Pvt. Ltd., filed its income
tax return manually for the Assessment Year (AY) 2004-05 on February 10,
2005, with the Income Tax Officer...
Facts of the
CaseM/s Shanker Trading (P) Ltd. was engaged in the
business of manufacturing and trading Katha and Cutch. The assessee had taken
on lease a manufacturing unit belonging to Mehta Charitable Prajnalaya Tru...
Facts of the CaseThe dispute involves a batch of six connected writ
petitions—specifically W.P.(C) Nos. 1765/2012, 1766/2012, 1767/2012, 1778/2012,
1784/2012, and 1785/2012—brought before the Division Bench of the ...