Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kedar Nath Gupta, Asha Kedar Nath Gupta, Mani Kakkar & Others – Delhi High Court on Evidentiary Value of Retracted Statements, Undisclosed Investment and Capital Gains under Sections 158BD & 132(4)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 81
Read More »
Facts of the Case A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on the premises of Rajinder Gupta. During the search, documents relating to purchase of KG Farms and Jyoti Farms ...

Smt. Meera Kapoor vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 and Addition under Section 68 for Alleged Bogus NRI Gift | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Smt. Meera Kapoor, received a gift amounting to ₹31 lakhs from an NRI donor, Shri Jagjit Singh Kochar, through cheque drawn from an NRE account. The amount w...

Court on Its Own Motion vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Mandatory Compliance of Section 245 of the Income Tax Act for Adjustment of Refunds Against Outstanding Tax Demand and Protection of TDS Credit Rights (Delhi High Court, 2012)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue Department acknowledged that taxpayers were facing difficulties in obtaining TDS credit and in receiving refunds because of adjustments against alleged outstanding tax ar...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Samsung India Electronics Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 260A Income Tax Act – Defective Stock Valuation, Entertainment Expenditure and Business Deduction Issues

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 81
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Samsung India Electronics Ltd., was engaged in the business of manufacturing and dealing in consumer products including televisions, cameras, refrigerators, washing machines and related e...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Samsung India Electronics Ltd. – Entertainment Expenditure, Foreign Exchange Fluctuation Adjustment under Section 43A, Revenue vs Capital Expenditure on Transmission Lines, Defective Stock Valuation, Brand Building & Dealer Loyalty Expenses | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSamsung India Electronics Ltd. was engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading consumer durable products such as televisions, cameras, refrigerators, washing machines and video recorders.The R...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs M/s Maruti Insurance Distribution Services Ltd. – Scope of Rectification under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Cannot Review or Rewrite Its Earlier Order

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Maruti Insurance Distribution Services Ltd., was engaged in the business of corporate insurance agency through an extensive network of Maruti dealers and workshops across India and fu...

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. & Another vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Another – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act on Royalty Expenditure, Change of Opinion and Requirement of Tangible Material

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMaruti Suzuki India Ltd. was engaged in the business of manufacture, purchase and sale of automobiles. For Assessment Year 2005–06, the company filed its return declaring total income and claimed ded...

Director of Income Tax vs. M/s Nokia Networks OY – Offshore Supply, Permanent Establishment (PE), Software Royalty & Taxability under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNokia Networks OY, incorporated in Finland, was engaged in manufacturing advanced GSM telecommunications systems and equipment.During Assessment Years 1997–98 and 1998–99: Nokia maintained a...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) – Deduction for Wage Revision Provision, Tax-Free Bond Interest Exemption, Donation Expenditure under Section 37(1), and Section 80HHB Project Loss Set-off | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, claimed deductions relating to provisions created for anticipated wage revisions based on previous experience, Pay Commission repor...

CIT v. Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited (BHEL) – Allowability of Wage Revision Provision, Tax-Free Bond Interest Exemption, Donation Deduction under Section 37(1), and Project-wise Deduction under Section 80HHB | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBHEL, a public sector undertaking, claimed various deductions and exemptions under the Income Tax Act for the relevant assessment years. BHEL made provisions towards wage revision liabilities ba...