Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,221,534
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (Name Not Available in Uploaded Order) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals on Low Tax Effect Threshold | ITA Nos. 74/2008, 285/2008, 312/2008, 510/2008, 512/2008, 637/2008, 976/2008, 1339/2008, 76/2009 & 849/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 202
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMultiple Income Tax Appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court.The Court examined the monetary impact involved in the appeals.It was found that the tax effect in the concerned matter...

Asian Paints Ltd. v. DCIT – ITAT Mumbai Quashes Section 263 Revision; Difference of Opinion with Assessing Officer Not Sufficient to Invoke Revisional Jurisdiction

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 199
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) seeking detailed explanations regarding: Deduction claimed under Section 80M; Pr...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V, New Delhi vs. Navin Chemicals Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Bogus Business Expenditure Claims and Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company, Navin Chemicals Manufacturing Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of chemical formulations. However, all manufacturing and business operations had remained suspended since 19...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Allowability of Prior Period Interest Expenditure and Crystallized Liability Under Mercantile System | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 197
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1998-99.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made two additions: Disallowance of prior period interest expenditure am...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeals Before Delhi High Court in ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 & 1020 of 2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the Case ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 and 1020 of 2009 were listed before the Delhi High Court. The appellant/assessee, through its counsel, requested permission to withdraw the appeals. The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Name Not Reflected in Order) – ITA No. 931/2011 | Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal as Withdrawn

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAn appeal bearing ITA No. 931/2011 was pending before the Delhi High Court. At the time of hearing, counsel for the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the request...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd. – Deduction under Section 80IA on Internet Services and Internet Telephony Cannot Be Denied in Subsequent Years After Initial Allowance | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company was originally incorporated as C.G. Graphnet Pvt. Ltd. and subsequently underwent changes in name and ownership before becoming Tata Communications Internet Serv...

Rahuljee & Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi High Court) – Allowability of Manufacturing Expenses, Proof of Business Expenditure and Reduction of Interest under Section 217 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing audio cassettes. It claimed deduction of ₹2,00,000 as manufacturing expenses allegedly paid to Mr. Sunil Kumar for asse...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Section 68 Addition on Flat Booking Advances | Delhi High Court on Tribunal's Power to Remand Matter for Fresh Investigation

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 2005-06. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee had received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294/- as advance money tow...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Section 68 Addition on Advances Received from Flat Buyers | Delhi High Court Remands Matter to ITAT for Decision on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in a real estate project, received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294 as advance money from 447 parties towards booking of flats for Assessment Year 2005-06.During assessment proceedi...