Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company was entitled to income tax refunds for
three assessment years. For AY 2005–06 and AY 2006–07, the department issued
refund cheques amounting to Rs. 51,85,752/- and Rs. 23,95,...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the
Delhi High Court challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal. The dispute centered on the formula prescribed under Section 10A f...
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department had filed multiple
appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal concerning the tax liabilities of Monnet Ispat & Ener...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company was engaged in the business of
sale of airtime, rental of handsets, and supply of SIM cards. It filed its
income tax return declaring losses for the relevant assessment year 2009...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the
Delhi High Court challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT). The controversy arose in relation to the computation mechan...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company claimed depreciation on land
amounting to Rs. 31,80,000 by clubbing it with building assets under the head
“property” in its balance sheet for AY 2007–08. Since land is not...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had upheld the order of the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] in favour of the assessee. ...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had upheld the order of the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] in favour of the assessee. ...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred appeals before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT),
whereby the Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax
(A...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee had originally filed the return
declaring net income of ₹98,850/-. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings were
initiated under Section 148 based on information received from the Directo...