Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs M/s Bharatpur Nutritional Products Limited – Section 41(1) Income Tax Act, Excise Duty Refund, Assessment Year 1987-88
Facts of the Case
The
respondent, M/s Bharatpur Nutritional Products Limited (formerly
Dalmia Industries Limited), received a refund of ₹42,05,173 from the
Excise Department for excise duty paid dur...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs. Delhi Tourism & Transport Development Corporation Ltd.: Analysis under Section 37 & Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Taxability of TIUF & OGES Expenditures
Facts of the Case
Delhi
Tourism & Transport Development Corporation Ltd. (DTTDC) was
established by the Delhi Government to manage tourism and transportation
services and liquor retail trade.
R...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi II vs Leo Financial Services Ltd.: Section 263 Income Tax Act, 1961 – Dividend Stripping & Section 40A(2)(b) Payment Dispute
Facts of the Case
The
Commissioner of Income Tax issued an order under Section 263 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, revising the assessment of Leo Financial Services Ltd. for
the assessment year 2001-02. ...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. New Delhi Hotels Ltd. | Business Loss vs Capital Loss on Advance Paid for Property Purchase under Sections 37, 36(1)(vii) & 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
FACTS OF THE CASEThe assessee, New Delhi Hotels Ltd., was engaged in the
business of construction, development, and dealing in real estate properties.
During the financial year 1990-91, the assessee entered into agreem...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs New Delhi Hotels Ltd – Allowability of Bad Debt as Business Loss under Section 37 vs Capital Loss under Sections 36(1)(vii) & 36(2), Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the Case
The
respondent, New Delhi Hotels Ltd, is a construction and real estate
company.
For Assessment
Year 2004-05, it declared income of ₹2,62,34,270/- in its return filed
on 1...
Tax Deductibility and Business Setup Principles Under Section 28 and Section 32: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sauer Danfoss Pvt Ltd
Facts of the CaseThe case arises from an appeal filed by the Revenue
(Commissioner of Income Tax) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the respondent-assessee, Sauer Danfoss Pvt Ltd, for the Assessme...
Characterization of Rental Income from Commercial Infrastructure: Business Profits under Section 28 vs. Income from House Property under Section 22 – Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mayar India Ltd.
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Profile & Return: The respondent-assessee, a corporate
entity, filed its return of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03 on
October 30, 2002, declaring a total income ...
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax: Retrospective Application of CBDT Circulars and 40% Waiver of Interest Under Section 234C
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking
to quash an order dated June 8, 2007, passed by the Chief Commissioner of
Income Tax (Central).
The
...
M/s. I.M. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Issue vs. Service of Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner company, M/s. I.M. Constructions Pvt. Ltd., filed its income
tax return manually for the Assessment Year (AY) 2004-05 on February 10,
2005, with the Income Tax Officer...
M/s Lachman Dass Bhatia Hingwala (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Validity of Search Assessment Proceedings Under Section 153A
Facts of the CaseThe dispute involves a batch of six connected writ
petitions—specifically W.P.(C) Nos. 1765/2012, 1766/2012, 1767/2012, 1778/2012,
1784/2012, and 1785/2012—brought before the Division Bench of the ...