Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,236,118
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs M/s MBL & Co. Ltd. & M/s Multiplex Capital Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Rebate under Section 88E Allowed Against MAT Liability under Section 115JB of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 212
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the orders of the ITAT. The assessees were members of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange an...

The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI vs. Sh. Sashi Mukundan & Connected Matters: Reaffirming Judicial Precedent in Expatriate Perquisite Valuation under Section 17

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 155
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed a batch of tax appeals (including ITA 379/2007, ITA 387/2008, and multiple connected matters) before the High Court of Delhi against various individual assessees and cor...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs M/s MBL & Co. Ltd. & M/s Multiplex Capital Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 88E Rebate on MAT Liability under Section 115JB of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the Case Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A against the decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. M/s Multiplex Capital Ltd. and M/s MBL & Co. Ltd. were members of recognized sto...

The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI vs. Sh. Sashi Mukundan & Ors. (In re: Expatriate Salary & Perquisites Taxation)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThis batch of Income Tax Appeals (headed by ITA 379/2007) was filed by the Revenue against various individual assessees and corporate agents. The dispute primarily involved the assessment of expatriate...

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Insecticides (India) Ltd. – Reassessment under Sections 147 & 148 Invalid Due to Vague Reasons and Absence of Tangible Material | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2003-04.For AY 2002-03, the original assessment had been completed under Secti...

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sh. Sashi Mukundan & Connected Matters: Taxation of Expatriate Salary Perquisites Under Section 17

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed a batch of appeals (ITA No. 379/2007 and multiple connected matters) against various individual assessees (including Sh. Sashi Mukundan, Mr. Short Donald, Mr. Fumio Goto...

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs Sunrise Tooling System Pvt. Ltd. – Statement Recorded During Survey under Section 133A Has No Evidentiary Value for Addition on Alleged Bogus Purchases | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseFor Assessment Year 2006–07, the Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹43,34,496/- on the basis of a statement allegedly made by Mr. D.K. Jain, Director of the assessee company, wherein it was st...

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs Empire Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. – Addition under Section 68 on Unexplained Share Capital and Share Premium where Investor Creditworthiness Not Established (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company was incorporated on 20.10.2005 and commenced business thereafter. For Assessment Year 2006–07, it disclosed receipt of share capital of ₹11 lakhs and issued sha...

Mohan Gupta (HUF) vs Commissioner of Income Tax-XI & Anr. – Delhi High Court on Reassessment under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act: Reopening Invalid Without Tangible Material (2014:DHC:539-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Mohan Gupta (HUF), filed its income tax return for AY 2005–06 declaring net income of ₹16,98,732/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Ac...

Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) vs Jayshree Gems & Jewellery – Section 10A Deduction on Export of Jewellery Manufacturing through Job Work and Allowability of Design & Fabrication Expenses | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and export of plated and studded jewellery. The firm came into existence on 12.08.2000 and obtained a Central Government licence on 18.08....