Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,190,582
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Autodecor Pvt. Ltd. (2005) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Assessed Loss Cases after Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Inc...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Autodecor Pvt. Ltd. (2005) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Assessed Loss Cases after Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 128
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Inc...

Comprehensive Case Analysis: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Usha Stud & Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd. (With ITA No. 106/2003 - CIT vs. Ameeta Mehra) on Stock Valuation of Livestock under Section 145 and Factual Determinations in Assessment

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee (M/s. Usha Stud & Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd.) is a private limited company engaged in the business of breeding and maintaining horses, alongside underta...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s C.G. Schlumberger Electricity – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Assessed Losses and Applicability of Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 114
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-ta...

M/s GKN Driveline India Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – Assessment Year 1995-96 | Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Following Earlier Decision

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 134
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s GKN Driveline India Ltd. filed the present appeal before the Delhi High Court concerning the Assessment Year 1995-96. The matter came up for consideration before the Division Bench of the High Cou...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Usha Stud & Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd. (2005): Valuation of Livestock Stock-in-Trade and Admissibility of Consistency in Method of Accounting under the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of breeding and maintaining horses, alongside running concurrent agricultural activities to produce feed ...

M/s GKN Driveline India Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – Assessment Year 1995-96 | Appeal Dismissed Following Earlier Decision

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s GKN Driveline India Ltd. filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order passed in relation to the Assessment Year 1995-96. The matter came up for hearing before the Division Ben...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. M/s Lunar Diamonds Ltd.: High Court of Delhi | ITA No. 62 of 2005 | 2005:DHC:9806-DB | Mandatory Service of Notice Within Limitation Period Under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Respondent/assessee filed its return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 1995-96 on November 29, 1995. The Assessing Officer (AO) dispatched a notice under Section 143(2) o...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Esteem Towers Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Addition of Share Capital Deleted as Shareholder Companies Found Genuine and Assessed to Tax | Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 140
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-company, M/s Esteem Towers Pvt. Ltd., had received amounts towards its share capital from certain companies. The Assessing Officer treated the share capital received as unexplained and ad...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Usha Stud & Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd.: Delhi High Court Upholds Rule of Consistency Under Section 145 and Rejects Revenue's Arbitrary Interference in Livestock Inventory Stock Valuation Methods Absent Substantial Question of Law

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee’s Business Profile: The respondent-assessee, M/s. Usha Stud & Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in the business of breeding and maintaining...