Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
681,147
Growing community

Penalty under Section 271E Barred by Limitation; Six-Month Period Runs from AO’s Initiation, Not JCIT Notice – PCIT-7 vs. Thapar Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 457
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’, for Assessment Year ...

Section 68 Addition on Share Capital Unsustainable Where Triple Test Satisfied; Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered – PCIT (Central)-2 vs. BDR Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 393
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 14.05.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2016–17 and 2018–...

Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained Through Regular Cash Withdrawals and Prior Cash Balances; No Substantial Question of Law – PCIT (Central) Gurugram vs. Pancham Realcon Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 305
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 07.11.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, which dismissed the Revenueâ...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Quashed as Time-Barred Post Finance Act 2021; Rajeev Bansal and Makemytrip Applied – Nimit Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 301
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Nimit Builders Private Limited, successor in interest of JK Jeet Clothes Private Limited and Verma Proptech Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 18.05.20...

Reassessment Notice for AY 2015–16 Quashed as Time-Barred; TOLA Inapplicable Post Rajeev Bansal – MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 282
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, MakeMyTrip India Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 19.05.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the order dated 27.07.2022 pas...

Reassessment for AY 2016–17 Set Aside as Time-Barred; Time Spent in Earlier Writ Cannot Extend Limitation – MK Jain HUF vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 286
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, MK Jain HUF, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 27.05.2024 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the order dated 31.07.2024 passed under Section 148...

Denial of Nil Withholding Certificate Unsustainable Where Income Exempt under Article 8 of DTAA; Reduced TDS Certificate Set Aside – Lufthansa Cargo AG vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 358
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Lufthansa Cargo AG, a company incorporated and tax resident of Germany, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 03.05.2024 passed under Section 195(3) of the Income-tax Act, ...

Challenge to Reassessment Order Rejected on Ground of Alternate Remedy; AO Complied with Kanwaljeet Kaur Directions – Meena Chawla vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 279
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Meena Chawla, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the notice dated 14.10.2022 issued under Section 148, the order dated 18.11.2022 passed under Section 148A(d), the reassessment ...

Adjustment of Refund During Stay of Demand Held Illegal; Section 245 Notice Mandatory – Huawei Telecommunications India Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 530
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Huawei Telecommunications India Company Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the rectified intimation dated 07.07.2022 issued under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, ...

Common Area Maintenance Charges Attract TDS under Section 194C and Not Section 194I; Revenue Appeals Dismissed – CIT (TDS)-01 vs. Diamond Tree (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 709
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed two appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘B’, in ITA Nos....