Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Delhi High Court) – Section 43B Income Tax Act on Excise Duty PLA Deposit, Unutilized MODVAT Credit, Sales Tax Recoverable & Software Expenditure Deduction
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Maruti Udyog Ltd., filed an appeal
before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 28 March 2005 concerning Assessment Year 2000–01.The dis...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. – Duty Drawback Accrual, Customs Duty Valuation, Excess Consumption of Raw Material, MODVAT Credit, Depreciation on Enhanced Liability and TDS on Foreign Commission Agents under Sections 40(a)(i) & 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal against the order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to Assessment Year 2001–02.
The dispute arose from multiple additions and disallowances made by the...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Addition for Alleged Excess Consumption of Raw Materials under Income Tax Act (AY 2000–01)
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated
05 September 2008 for Assessment Year 2000–01.The Assessing Officer ha...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Addition on Alleged Excessive Consumption of Raw Material, Stock Discrepancy under RG-23 Register & Taxability of Duty Drawback under Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The Assessing Officer observed discrepancies between physical stock
records and RG-23 Part-II excise records.
Based on such discrepancies, an addition of Rs. 643.34 Crores
was made all...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Duty Drawback Income under the Income-tax Act, 1961 | AY 1994–95, 1997–98 & 1998–99
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi
High Court challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT), wherein the Tribunal held in favour of the assessee, Maruti Suzuki...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 43B, Section 145A, Section 14A & Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Customs Duty in Closing Stock, Interest Disallowance & Export Deduction
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Maruti Udyog Ltd., had paid customs
duty on imported raw materials and inputs and claimed deduction under Section
43B on actual payment basis. During assessment proceedings, the Assessin...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Duty Drawback Income under the Income-tax Act | Accrual of Income and Year of Taxability
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against the order passed
by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years 1995–96
and 1996–97.The dispute pertained to substantial amounts
claimed...
Sunbeam Auto Private Limited vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court on Taxability of Sales Tax Subsidy as Capital Receipt under Sections 143(3) and 264 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner-company, Sunbeam Auto Private Limited, received
sales tax subsidy under a government incentive scheme for industrial
development. During assessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2007â...
Sunbeam Auto Private Limited vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court on Sales Tax Subsidy as Capital Receipt under Sections 143(3) & 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseSunbeam Auto Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging
the order dated 30 March 2015 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income
Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The revision appl...
Sunbeam Auto Private Limited vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Sales Tax Subsidy Held as Capital Receipt under Sections 143(3) & 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseSunbeam Auto Private Limited received sales tax subsidy under
an industrial incentive scheme. During assessment proceedings for Assessment
Years 2007–08 to 2010–11, the Assessing Officer treated th...