DCF Valuation Substantiated by Expert Cannot Be Rejected on Generic Disclaimers; Section 56(2)(viib) Addition Set Aside – PCIT-1 vs. A.H. Multisoft Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2016–17. The Tribunal...

Section 153A Assessment Without Incriminating Material Unsustainable; Kabul Chawla and Abhisar Buildwell Applied – PCIT-1 vs. Charvak Trading Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 16.06.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010–11. The Tribunal...

Repair and Maintenance Services of Aircraft Equipment Do Not “Make Available” Technical Knowledge; Receipts Not Taxable as FTS/FIS under India–US DTAA – PCIT (International Taxation) vs. Goodrich Corporation (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2018–19. The Tribunal...

Protective Additions Under Section 68 Not Sustainable Once Substantive Additions Made in Hands of Beneficiaries; Shell Conduit Cannot Be Taxed – PCIT, Delhi-7 vs. Third Generation Traders Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging a common order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2012-13 to...

Addition on Alleged Bogus Purchases and Sales Leads to Double Taxation Where Income Already Offered; Section 145(3) Not Properly Invoked – PCIT (Central), Ludhiana vs. Garg Acrylics Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order dated 27.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2011–12. The T...

Form 26AS Mismatch Due to Apparent Errors Not “Tangible Material” for Reopening; Reassessment Based on Erroneous TDS Data Invalid – PCIT vs. Sanjay Pratap Singh (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sanjay Pratap Singh, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2009–10 on 25.07.2009 declaring total income of ₹10,92,498/-, comprising salary income and income from other source...

Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts; Section 147 Jurisdiction Fails in Share Capital Case – PCIT vs. K.R. Pulp and Papers Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s K.R. Pulp and Papers Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing kraft and brown paper, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2009–10 on 26.09.2009 declaring in...

Reassessment Notice for AY 2013–14 Issued Beyond Residual Limitation under Section 149 Quashed; Computation Governed by Rajeev Bansal and Ram Balram Buildhome – Parveen Kumar Malhotra vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Parveen Kumar Malhotra, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated 29.07.2...

TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied to NRI Seller for Deductor’s Use of Wrong Form; Revenue Directed to Correct Records and Grant Refund – Parag Keshav Bopardikar vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Parag Keshav Bopardikar, a Non-Resident Indian and tax resident of the United States of America, filed a writ petition challenging various communications and actions of the Income Tax ...

Refund Cannot Be Withheld Where Rectified Return Was Never Declared Invalid; Revenue Directed to Process Refund for AY 2016–17 – Mukesh Garg vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mukesh Garg, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Revenue to process his return of income for Assessment Year 2016–17 and grant refund of ₹1,16,94,870/- along with statu...