Section 149(1)(c) Cannot Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Notices Even in Foreign Asset Cases; Notices Beyond Original Limitation Quashed – K.S. Dhingra vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, K.S. Dhingra, filed writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen concluded assessments for Assessment Years 1997–98 and 2...

Reassessment for AY 2013–14 Barred by Limitation Where Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakhs; Section 148 Notice Quashed in Alleged Penny Stock Case – Manjeet Kaur Duggal vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Manjeet Kaur Duggal, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated 15.07.2022 ...

Reassessment and Assessment Orders Issued in Name of Deceased Assessee Are Void Ab Initio; Jurisdiction Fails in Absence of Valid Section 148 Notice – Laxmi Devi (Deceased) vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Narendra Mann, legal heir of the deceased assessee Laxmi Devi, filed a writ petition challenging the assessment order dated 30.03.2022 and the consequential demand notice issued for As...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Issued After 1 April 2021 Liable to Be Dropped Following Revenue Concession in Rajeev Bansal; Section 148 Notice Quashed – Kum Kum Kohli vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kum Kum Kohli, an individual assessee, filed a writ petition impugning the order dated 23.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice ...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Issued After 1 April 2021 Liable to Be Dropped in View of Revenue Concession in Rajeev Bansal; Section 148 Notice Quashed – Kirti Kumar Dawar vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kirti Kumar Dawar, an individual assessee, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential no...

Section 149(1)(c) Cannot Revive Time-Barred Reassessment; Notices Beyond Original Limitation Quashed – K.S. Dhingra vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, K.S. Dhingra, filed writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen concluded assessments for Assessment Years 1997–98 and 2...

Acquittal under Sections 276B and 278B Upheld Where Reasonable Cause for Delay in TDS Deposit Established under Section 278AA – ITO vs. MKY Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed three criminal leave petitions challenging a common judgment dated 28.10.2021 passed by the Trial Court acquitting MKY Constructions Private Limited (formerly Action Br...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Issued After 1 April 2021 Liable to Be Dropped in View of Revenue Concession in Rajeev Bansal; Section 148 Notice Quashed – Gain Capital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Gain Capital Private Limited, filed a writ petition impugning the order dated 25.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated 27....

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Issued After 1 April 2021 Liable to Be Dropped in View of Revenue Concession in Rajeev Bansal; Section 148 Notice Quashed – Chandra Prakash Srivastava vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Chandra Prakash Srivastava, ex-director of Aten Portfolio Managers Private Limited (now dissolved), filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28.07.2022 passed under Section 14...

Extended 16-Year Limitation under Section 149(1)(c) Not Retrospective; Reassessment Notices for Concluded Years Quashed – BJN Holdings (I) Ltd. vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBJN Holdings (I) Ltd. filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for various assessment years ranging from AY 1998–99 to AY 2005–06. The ...