Blog Categories
All Posts Accounting 2 Accounting Standard 12 CBDT 1 Chartered Accountant 1 Chartered Engineer 1 Greetings 1 Labour Law 2 MCA Notification 1 MSME 1 NGO- Trust & Society 0 PLACEMENT 1 Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2 RBI & Banks 1 RERA 0 RTI 1 STUDENT ICAI 2 Virtual Webinar 7
Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,224,497
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

FIITJEE Ltd. (Successor of Times A & M (India) Ltd.) vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax–2 | Delhi High Court | Disallowance of Bogus Advertisement Expenses & Software Depreciation u/s 32 & 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, FIITJEE Ltd. (successor of Times A & M (India) Ltd.), claimed deductions for web advertisement expenses and depreciation on purchase of customized software for Assessment Years 2004â...

Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | ITA 52/2019 & ITA 53/2019 | Appeal Withdrawn After Success in Remand Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. and Aradhana Foods and Juice Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.D...

FIITJEE Ltd. (Successor of Times A & M (India) Ltd.) vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 | Delhi High Court | Disallowance of Bogus Web Advertisement & Software Depreciation Claims | Sections 131, 133(6), 143, 147 Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe appellant, FIITJEE Ltd. (successor of Times A & M (India) Ltd.), claimed deductions for: Web advertisement expenses, and Depreciation on purchase of customized software ...

Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Appeal Withdrawn After Success in Remand Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 153
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. and Aradhana Foods and Juice Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders under the Income Tax Act.During the pen...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Suresh Mittal & Anr. | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed by Delhi High Court (2019:DHC:7387-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court, including ITA No. 43/2010, ITA No. 47/2010, and ITA No. 1499/2010, against the respondents (Suresh Mittal and Karan Sawhney).At th...

Genpact India Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Maintainability of Writ Petition vis-à-vis Section 115QA Buyback Tax Demand under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 166
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Genpact India Private Limited, challenged an assessment order dated 31 December 2016 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014–15. The dispute primarily concerned...

Vedanta Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 26(1) & Anr. (2019) – Reopening of Assessment u/s 147/148 on Accommodation Entries

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vedanta Limited (successor of Sterlite Industries Pvt. Ltd.), challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2012–13. The Assessing Off...

NBCC (India) Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. – Special Audit u/s 142(2A) Upheld by Delhi High Court (2019)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 159
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, NBCC (India) Ltd., a government-backed construction company, filed its income tax return for AY 2017–18 and subsequently revised it. The case was selected for scrutiny under Section ...

Ankush Jain & Anr. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 (Delhi High Court, 2019) – IDS Declaration Held Void for Suppression of Facts under Finance Act, 2016

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain, filed declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) pursuant to Section 183 of the Finance Act, 2016, declaring undisclosed income of ₹...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 vs BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. (2020) – Scope of Remand, Depreciation on Energy Meters & AO’s Jurisdiction under Section 32 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 174
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., claimed 80% depreciation on electronic/energy meters, asserting that they qualify as energy-saving devices. The ITAT (order dated 05....