Facts of the
Case
The assessee filed its return for AY 2005-06 declaring a loss of
₹41.72 crores.
Assessment was completed under Section 143(3), determining income
at ₹40.29 crores.
A notic...
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, OYO Hotels and Homes Private Limited, filed
its Income Tax Return for Assessment Year 2020–21 declaring substantial losses
and claiming a refund arising primarily due to Tax Deducted ...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners (including DLF and other developers) were engaged in real
estate development.
They
paid External Development Charges (EDC) to Haryana Urban
Development Autho...
Facts of the Case
Petitioners
are real estate developers engaged in development projects in Haryana.
They
paid External Development Charges (EDC) to HUDA as a statutory
requirement under HDRUA Act ...
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2015–16,
wherein the petitioner challenged the order dated 24.11.2022 passed under
Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A notice under Se...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Draken Metals Trading Private Limited, filed
the present writ petition challenging:
Order
dated 26.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961
Conse...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner had undergone scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3),
completed on 29.12.2016.
A
reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 was issued for AY 2014–15 under
Sect...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Modi Industries Limited, filed its return of
income which was scrutinized under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. During
the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a company engaged in export of readymade
garments, was issued a notice under Section 148A(b) alleging that it had
received accommodation entries from two entities—Balaji Enterprises a...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kamal Nath, challenged notices issued under
Section 153C of the Income Tax Act for multiple assessment years ranging from
AY 2010–11 to AY 2020–21. The reassessment proceedings were...